CVE-2026-4513
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was detected in vanna-ai vanna up to 2.0.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function ask of the file vanna\legacy\base\base.py. Performing a manipulation results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the ask function of vanna\legacy\base\base.py in vanna-ai vanna up to version 2.0.2 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through user-supplied input without proper sanitization or parameterized queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed vanna versionRun 'pip show vanna' or 'pip list | grep vanna' to see the installed versionAffected if Version is 2.0.2 or below (up to and including 2.0.2)
-
Locate the vulnerable fileFind vanna/legacy/base/base.py in your Python environment (run 'python -c "import vanna; print(vanna.__file__)"' to get the base path)Affected if The file exists and contains an 'ask' function that processes user input as SQL
-
Inspect the ask function implementationOpen vanna/legacy/base/base.py and examine the 'ask' function for direct string concatenation or formatting of SQL queries using user inputAffected if The function constructs SQL queries by concatenating user-supplied input without using parameterized queries or proper escaping
-
Determine if legacy module is in useSearch your codebase for imports like 'from vanna.legacy import VannaBase' or direct usage of the legacy moduleAffected if Your application imports or uses the vanna.legacy module which contains the vulnerable code
-
Check for user input exposure to ask functionReview your application code that calls the 'ask' function and trace whether web forms, API parameters, or other user-controllable data are passed as the SQL question inputAffected if User-supplied input flows directly to the ask function without validation
You are affected if you are using vanna version 2.0.2 or lower, your code imports from vanna.legacy, and user input reaches the ask function without validation or parameterized query usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor did not respond, assess if a patched version is available; otherwise, implement proper input validation and convert dynamic SQL queries to parameterized queries in the affected function.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4513 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data