CVE-2026-45233
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHTMLy CMS through 3.1.1 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated attackers to relocate arbitrary files by supplying directory traversal sequences in the oldfile parameter at the admin autosave endpoint. Attackers can pass unsanitized traversal sequences directly to file_exists() and rename() functions in admin.php without canonicalization or directory boundary enforcement to cause unintended relocation of any file writable by the web server process to an attacker-specified draft location.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHTMLy CMS through 3.1.1 suffers from a path traversal vulnerability in admin.php at the autosave endpoint. The oldfile parameter accepts unsanitized directory traversal sequences that are passed directly to file_exists() and rename() functions without canonicalization or directory boundary enforcement, allowing authenticated low-privilege attackers to relocate arbitrary files writable by the web server to attacker-specified draft locations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check HTMLy CMS versionLocate the version file or check the admin dashboard for the installed version number. Common locations include a version.php file or the admin footer.Affected if The installed version is 3.1.1 or earlier (any version 'through 3.1.1').
-
Verify admin.php existsCheck if admin.php file exists in the web root directory of the HTMLy installation.Affected if admin.php is present in the application directory.
-
Confirm admin authentication is in useReview the admin configuration or attempt to access the admin panel to verify whether authentication is enabled and low-privilege admin accounts can be created.Affected if Authentication is enabled and low-privilege admin users exist in the system.
-
Check web server write permissionsIdentify directories writable by the web server process (commonly the 'content' or 'images' folders, or any user-uploaded content directories).Affected if The web server has write permissions to any application directories accessible via the oldfile parameter in the autosave endpoint.
-
Inspect oldfile parameter handlingExamine admin.php source code for the autosave function to verify if the oldfile parameter is passed to file_exists() or rename() without sanitization.Affected if The oldfile parameter is used in file operations without proper path validation or canonicalization.
A user is affected if they run HTMLy CMS version 3.1.1 or earlier, have the admin.php endpoint accessible, and the web server has write permissions to directories that could be targeted through directory traversal in the oldfile parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input validation with real-path canonicalization to resolve the true file path and verify it stays within an allowed directory boundary before any file operations. Restrict the rename operation to only files within the designated draft/backup directory.
HTMLy CMS version newer than 3.1.1 (check official releases for the first patched version)
- Check the official HTMLy CMS releases page (github.com/danpros/htmly or danpros.com) for versions newer than 3.1.1 that address this vulnerability
- If a patched version (e.g., 3.1.2 or later) is available, plan and schedule the upgrade following standard CMS upgrade procedures
- Backup the current installation including database and all files before upgrading
- Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production
- After upgrading, verify the fix by attempting a controlled, authorized test of the autosave endpoint with traversal sequences to confirm the vulnerability is patched
- If no patched version is available, implement a WAF rule to block directory traversal patterns (.., /, \) in the oldfile parameter at the web application layer as a temporary mitigation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45233 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45233 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data