OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2026-45369

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
python-utcp is the python implementation of UTCP. Prior to 1.1.3, the _substitute_utcp_args method in cli_communication_protocol.py inserts user-controlled tool_args values directly into shell command strings without any sanitization or escaping. These commands are then executed via /bin/bash -c (Unix) or powershell.exe -Command (Windows), allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary shell commands. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

python-utcp versions before 1.1.3 contain a command injection vulnerability in the _substitute_utcp_args method within cli_communication_protocol.py. User-supplied tool_args values are concatenated directly into shell command strings without sanitization or escaping, then executed through /bin/bash -c on Unix or powershell.exe -Command on Windows, allowing arbitrary command execution.

MitigationUpgrade to python-utcp version 1.1.3 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, implement input validation and proper shell escaping (e.g., shlex.quote for Unix, appropriate escaping for PowerShell) on all tool_args before inserting them into command strings.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed python-utcp version
    Run 'pip show python-utcp' or 'pip list | grep utcp' to see the installed version number
    Affected if The installed version is below 1.1.3
  2. Locate cli_communication_protocol.py
    Find the file in your python environment (e.g., run 'python -c "import utcp; print(utcp.__file__)"' then navigate to cli_communication_protocol.py in the same directory)
    Affected if The file exists in the environment
  3. Inspect _substitute_utcp_args method for vulnerable code pattern
    Open cli_communication_protocol.py and locate the _substitute_utcp_args method. Look for direct string concatenation of tool_args into command strings without shlex.quote or equivalent escaping, followed by subprocess/popen calls using shell=True or /bin/bash -c
    Affected if The method contains direct concatenation of tool_args into shell command strings without sanitization
  4. Check if tool_args from user input reaches the vulnerable function
    Review your application code to see if tool_args parameter (from user input, API calls, or config files) is passed to the _substitute_utcp_args method
    Affected if User-supplied tool_args values are being passed to the vulnerable method and executed through shell commands

You are affected if python-utcp version is below 1.1.3 AND your application uses tool_args that reach the vulnerable _substitute_utcp_args method with unsanitized input flowing into shell command execution.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to python-utcp version 1.1.3 or later. If upgrading is not immediately possible, implement input validation and proper shell escaping (e.g., shlex.quote for Unix, appropriate escaping for PowerShell) on all tool_args before inserting them into command strings.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.1.3

  1. Upgrade python-utcp to version 1.1.3 or later to remediate the OS command injection vulnerability in the _substitute_utcp_args method in cli_communication_protocol.py

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45369 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45369 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data