CWE-248Weakness · CWE-248

CVE-2026-45554

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Prior to version 3.12.0, two FastAPI routes that serve per-component static assets in NiceGUI accept a sub-path parameter that may resolve to a directory rather than a file. Requests that resolve to a directory raise an unhandled RuntimeError inside Starlette's FileResponse, which Uvicorn writes to the server log as a full traceback. Because the routes are reachable without authentication, a remote attacker can amplify log volume and consume disk and log-pipeline capacity on any publicly reachable NiceGUI server. This issue has been patched in version 3.12.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

NiceGUI versions before 3.12.0 have two FastAPI routes for serving per-component static assets that accept a sub-path parameter. When this parameter resolves to a directory instead of a file, Starlette's FileResponse raises an unhandled RuntimeError. Since these routes are accessible without authentication, remote attackers can repeatedly trigger this error to cause log amplification and consume disk/log-pipeline capacity.

MitigationUpgrade NiceGUI to version 3.12.0 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. Consider implementing log rotation or rate limiting as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed NiceGUI version
    Run `pip show nicegui` or check your dependency lock file for the nicegui package version
    Affected if Version is lower than 3.12.0
  2. Verify the application uses NiceGUI's built-in static asset serving
    Inspect your application startup code to confirm you are using NiceGUI's default run() method or ui.run() which registers the vulnerable static asset routes
    Affected if Your application uses NiceGUI's default static asset serving without custom routing that blocks the vulnerable endpoints
  3. Confirm the static asset routes are network-accessible
    Check your server's bind address and firewall rules to determine if the NiceGUI application port (default 8080) is exposed to unauthenticated network access
    Affected if The NiceGUI server port is reachable from untrusted networks without authentication barriers
  4. Look for the characteristic error signature in server logs
    Search your Uvicorn/server logs for entries containing 'RuntimeError' and 'Is a directory' or similar path-resolution failures related to static asset requests
    Affected if Your logs contain repeated RuntimeError tracebacks indicating directory path traversal attempts on static asset routes

You are affected if NiceGUI version is below 3.12.0 AND the application serves static assets via the default NiceGUI routes on an accessible port, as evidenced by unauthenticated requests triggering RuntimeError tracebacks in logs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade NiceGUI to version 3.12.0 or later, which contains the patch for this vulnerability. Consider implementing log rotation or rate limiting as a defense-in-depth measure.

Recommended fix High confidence

NiceGUI 3.12.0

  1. Check the currently installed NiceGUI version using `pip show nicegui` or `pip list | grep nicegui`
  2. Upgrade NiceGUI to version 3.12.0 or later using `pip install --upgrade nicegui>=3.12.0`
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version with `pip show nicegui`
  4. Restart the NiceGUI application to ensure the patched version is loaded

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45554 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45554 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data