CWE-405Weakness · CWE-405

CVE-2026-45557

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Technitium DNS Server aggressively tries to fetch missing RRSIG records or mismatched DNSKEY records. An attacker in control of a domain can cause a vulnerable system to generate excessive network traffic. Fixed in 15.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Technitium DNS Server has a flaw where it aggressively attempts to fetch missing RRSIG records or mismatched DNSKEY records during DNSSEC validation. An attacker controlling a malicious domain can trigger this behavior, causing the vulnerable DNS server to generate excessive outbound network traffic as it repeatedly attempts to fetch records that don't exist or have mismatched keys.

MitigationUpgrade Technitium DNS Server to version 15.0 or later to obtain the patch. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, consider implementing query rate limiting or monitoring for anomalous DNS query volumes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Technitium DNS Server is installed
    Look for the Technitium DNS Server process in running services or check installed programs. On Linux, run 'systemctl status technitium-dns' or check for the DNS server process.
    Affected if Technitium DNS Server is found running on the system
  2. Identify the installed version
    Access the DNS server web admin panel (typically port 5380) and check the version displayed in the dashboard, or check the installed package version using system package managers.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 15.0
  3. Verify DNSSEC validation is enabled
    In the web admin panel, go to 'DNSSEC' settings and check if DNSSEC validation is turned on. On config files, look for 'enableDnssec' or similar DNSSEC-related configuration options.
    Affected if DNSSEC validation is enabled and version is below 15.0
  4. Check for excessive outbound DNS traffic
    Monitor network traffic using tools like tcpdump or Wireshark on the DNS server's external interface. Look for a high volume of outgoing DNS queries, particularly to authoritative nameservers for domains the server is validating.
    Affected if The server is generating unusually high outbound DNS traffic to external authoritative servers

A user is affected if they are running Technitium DNS Server version below 15.0 with DNSSEC validation enabled, and they observe or have historically observed excessive outbound DNS traffic patterns.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Technitium DNS Server to version 15.0 or later to obtain the patch. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, consider implementing query rate limiting or monitoring for anomalous DNS query volumes.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Technitium DNS Server 15.0

  1. 1. Backup the current Technitium DNS Server configuration and data
  2. 2. Stop the Technitium DNS Server service
  3. 3. Download Technitium DNS Server version 15.0 or later from the official GitHub releases page (github.com/TechnitiumSoftware/DnsServer)
  4. 4. Install the updated version following standard upgrade procedures
  5. 5. Verify the service starts successfully
  6. 6. Test DNS resolution functionality to confirm normal operation
  7. 7. Monitor network traffic patterns to verify the fix is effective
Caveat Review release notes for version 15.0 to check for any configuration or feature changes from previous versions

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45557 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45557 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data