CVE-2026-45598
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock (AFD.sys) where improper synchronization of shared resources allows a local authenticated attacker to elevate privileges to higher permission levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9234< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the installed Windows build numberAffected if The build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.9234 (Win10 1607), 17763.8880 (Win10 1809), 19044.7417 (Win10 21h2), 19045.7417 (Win10 22h2), 22631.7219 (Win11 23h2), 26100.8655 (Win11 24h2), 26200.8655 (Win11 25h2), or 28000.2269 (Win11 26h1)
-
Check AFD.sys file versionOpen File Explorer, navigate to C:\Windows\System32\drivers\afd.sys, right-click, select Properties, and view the Details tab for the File versionAffected if The file version is lower than the corresponding patched version for your Windows build, or the version field is empty or missing
-
Verify Windows Update statusOpen Settings > Windows Update > Update history and look for recent security updates; alternatively, run 'systeminfo' and check the 'Hotfix(s)' field for KB entries related to 2026Affected if No recent security update containing CVE-2026-45598 fixes is listed in the update history, or the system has not been patched within the expected timeframe for this vulnerability
The system is affected if it is running a Windows version with a build number lower than the patched thresholds AND the AFD.sys file version does not reflect the security fix.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.923410.0.17763.888010.0.19044.7417
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows when released; until then, limit local access to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious privilege escalation activity.
Apply the relevant Windows Security Update (KB patch) to reach the fixed build number for your Windows version
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest cumulative security updates
- After installation, verify the OS build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release: Windows 10 1607 should be 10.0.14393.9234 or later; Windows 10 1809 should be 10.0.17763.8880 or later; Windows 10 21h2 should be 10.0.19044.7417 or later; Windows 10 22h2 should be 10.0.19045.7417 or later; Windows 11 23h2 should be 10.0.22631.7219 or later; Windows 11 24h2 should be 10.0
- To check the build number, run 'winver' from the Run dialog or 'systeminfo' from Command Prompt
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45598 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45598 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data