CVE-2026-45601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Ancillary Function Driver for WinSock allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Windows Ancillary Function Driver (AFD.sys) for WinSock. The driver improperly synchronizes access to shared resources during concurrent operations, allowing a local authenticated attacker to exploit the timing window and elevate privileges to SYSTEM level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9234< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionRun 'winver' or execute 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to retrieve the installed Windows build numberAffected if The build number falls below any of these thresholds: 14393.9234 (1607), 17763.8880 (1809), 19044.7417 (21h2), 19045.7417 (22h2), 22631.7219 (23h2), 26100.8655 (24h2), 26200.8655 (25h2), or 28000.2269 (26h1)
-
Locate AFD driver fileNavigate to C:\Windows\System32\drivers\afd.sys and retrieve file properties, or run 'Get-ItemProperty C:\Windows\System32\drivers\afd.sys' via PowerShellAffected if The AFD driver file exists on the system, indicating the vulnerable component is present
-
Check AFD driver versionRight-click afd.sys, select Properties, then Details to view the File Version field; alternatively use 'wmic datafile where "name='C:\\\\Windows\\\\System32\\\\drivers\\\\afd.sys'" get Version'Affected if The driver version is older than the patched build corresponding to your Windows version (exact patched versions vary by Windows release as listed in affected version ranges)
A system is affected if it runs any Windows 10 or 11 build version listed as vulnerable and contains the unpatched AFD driver for that build range.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.923410.0.17763.888010.0.19044.7417
Apply the Microsoft security update for this vulnerability through Windows Update or manually install the relevant KB when released. Until patched, monitor for suspicious local privilege escalation attempts.
Windows 10 1607: build 10.0.14393.9234 or later | Windows 10 1809: build 10.0.17763.8880 or later | Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.7417 or later | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.7417 or later | Windows 11 23h2: build 10.0.22631.7219 or later | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.8655 or later |
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which affected version category applies to your system from the list: Windows 10 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, or Windows 11 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, 26h1
- Apply Windows updates via Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update, or manually download and install the specific cumulative update for your version
- Verify the update installed successfully by checking the OS build number matches or exceeds: 10.0.14393.9234 (1607), 10.0.17763.8880 (1809), 10.0.19044.7417 (21h2), 10.0.19045.7417 (22h2), 10.0.22631.7219 (23h2), 10.0.26100.8655 (24h2), 10.0.26200.8655 (25h2), or 10.0.28000.2269 (26h1)
- Restart the system as prompted to complete the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data