Incorrect AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-863

CVE-2026-45718

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.38.1, the row action trigger endpoint (POST /api/tables/:sourceId/actions/:actionId/trigger) fails to validate that the user-supplied rowId is within the scope of the view's row filters. A user with access to a filtered view can trigger row actions on any row in the underlying table, including rows explicitly excluded by the view's security filters. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.38.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The row action trigger endpoint (POST /api/tables/:sourceId/actions/:actionId/trigger) in Budibase versions prior to 3.38.1 fails to validate that the user-supplied rowId is within the scope of view-level row filters. This allows authenticated users with access to a filtered view to bypass security filters and trigger row actions on any row in the underlying table, including rows explicitly excluded by the view's security configuration.

MitigationUpgrade Budibase to version 3.38.1 or later, which implements proper validation of rowId against view security filters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Budibase installation
    Locate the Budibase service or application - typically runs on port 10000 or check for budibase processes/services
    Affected if Budibase is present in the environment
  2. Check Budibase version
    Access the Budibase admin panel or check the container/service version metadata. Compare the installed version to 3.38.1
    Affected if Version is lower than 3.38.1 (e.g., 3.38.0, 3.37.x, etc.)
  3. Verify row action trigger endpoint exists
    Confirm the endpoint POST /api/tables/:sourceId/actions/:actionId/trigger is accessible in the Budibase API
    Affected if The endpoint is present and responds to requests
  4. Confirm view-level row filters are configured
    Check if any views exist with row-level security filters configured in Budibase
    Affected if Filtered views with security configurations exist in the system
  5. Check user access to filtered views
    Identify authenticated users who have access to views with row filters and row actions enabled
    Affected if Users have access to filtered views that expose row actions

The environment is affected if running Budibase version lower than 3.38.1 with filtered views that have row actions enabled, allowing authenticated users to bypass view-level row security filters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Budibase to version 3.38.1 or later, which implements proper validation of rowId against view security filters.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Upgrade to Budibase version 3.38.1 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current Budibase installation version by checking the running container or application metadata
  2. 2. If running via Docker or docker-compose, stop the current Budibase services
  3. 3. Pull or update to Budibase version 3.38.1 or later
  4. 4. Restart the Budibase services to apply the updated version
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version in the UI or via API
  6. 6. Test that row actions through filtered views respect view-level security filters as expected

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45718 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45718 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data