CVE-2026-4579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was identified in code-projects Simple Laundry System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /viewdetail.php of the component Parameters Handler. The manipulation of the argument serviceId leads to sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in code-projects Simple Laundry System 1.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries through the serviceId parameter in /viewdetail.php. The Parameters Handler component fails to properly sanitize user input before using it in database queries, enabling full database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Simple Laundry System installationLocate the web application's document root and verify the presence of Simple Laundry System files, typically found in the web server's htdocs, www, or public_html directories.Affected if The application files for Simple Laundry System are present on the server.
-
Identify installed versionCheck for a version file, readme.txt, or examine the main PHP files for a version identifier. Compare against version 1.0.Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.0.
-
Verify vulnerable file existsLocate the file /viewdetail.php within the application directory structure. This file should exist in the web-accessible path.Affected if The file /viewdetail.php exists in the web-accessible application directory.
-
Check serviceId parameter acceptanceExamine the source code of /viewdetail.php to confirm it accepts a serviceId GET or POST parameter without proper sanitization.Affected if The file processes the serviceId parameter from user input.
-
Confirm direct database accessInspect the Parameters Handler component in /viewdetail.php to verify it constructs SQL queries using the serviceId parameter directly.Affected if The code builds SQL queries by concatenating the serviceId parameter without using prepared statements or input sanitization.
A user is affected if they have Code Projects Simple Laundry System version 1.0 running with the /viewdetail.php file accessible and processing the serviceId parameter without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable the affected /viewdetail.php endpoint or the entire application until a patch can be applied. Implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for the serviceId parameter to remediate the SQL injection.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data