CVE-2026-4627
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in D-Link DIR-825 and DIR-825R 1.0.5/4.5.1. Affected is the function handler_update_system_time of the file libdeuteron_modules.so of the component NTP Service. The manipulation results in os command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in the NTP service (libdeuteron_modules.so, function handler_update_system_time) of D-Link DIR-825 and DIR-825R routers allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via manipulated input to the time update functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelCheck the device label or web interface for the exact model number (DIR-825 or DIR-825R). Access the router admin panel via its IP address and look for the status or firmware page to confirm the model.Affected if The device is a D-Link DIR-825 or DIR-825R router.
-
Confirm NTP client service is enabledLog into the router web interface and navigate to the time settings or NTP configuration section. Check if the router is configured to synchronize time with an external NTP server.Affected if The NTP time synchronization feature is enabled and pointing to an external NTP server.
-
Check remote management exposureIn the router web interface, examine the remote management or administration settings. Determine if the web-based management interface is accessible from the WAN (Internet) side.Affected if Remote management (HTTP/HTTPS administration from WAN) is enabled, allowing unauthenticated or weakly authenticated remote access to the device.
-
Verify firmware versionIn the router admin panel, locate the firmware version information (typically under Status, Maintenance, or System section). Compare this version against any available D-Link firmware releases for the DIR-825 series.Affected if The installed firmware is an older release that has not been updated to address the command injection vulnerability.
-
Inspect network exposure of NTP portFrom an external network perspective (or using network scanning tools), check if UDP port 123 (NTP) is open and reachable from the WAN interface of the router.Affected if The NTP service port 123 is exposed to untrusted networks, increasing the attack surface for the time update functionality.
The environment is affected if a D-Link DIR-825 or DIR-825R router has the NTP time synchronization feature enabled with remote management accessible, as this allows the command injection flaw in the handler_update_system_time function to be exploited.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedReplace end-of-life DIR-825 devices or implement strict network segmentation/firewall controls to isolate affected devices, as no vendor patch is available for these discontinued products.
- This vulnerability affects D-Link DIR-825 and DIR-825R versions 1.0.5/4.5.1 which are end-of-life products no longer supported by the vendor.
- No official patch, firmware update, or upgrade path is available from D-Link for these discontinued products.
- The device should be decommissioned and replaced with a currently supported model if NTP functionality is required.
- If continued use is unavoidable, network isolation and strict firewall rules should be implemented to limit exposure to remote attacks.
- Consider implementing NTP services on separate, hardened infrastructure rather than using the vulnerable device.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4627 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4627 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data