CVE-2026-4630
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated client could exploit an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Authorization Services Protection API endpoint. By knowing or obtaining a resource's unique identifier (UUID) belonging to another Resource Server within the same realm, the client could bypass authorization checks. This allows the client to perform unauthorized GET, PUT, and DELETE operations on resources, leading to information disclosure and potential unauthorized modification or deletion of data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKeycloak's Authorization Services Protection API contains an IDOR vulnerability where an authenticated client can access resources belonging to different Resource Servers within the same realm by directly referencing those resources' UUIDs. This bypasses authorization checks and allows unauthorized GET, PUT, and DELETE operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 26.4, < 26.4.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Keycloak versionCheck the Keycloak version through the admin console (Server info tab) or by examining the jar file name in the installation directory, or run: `kc.sh --version` from the Keycloak bin directoryAffected if The installed version is 26.4.x and is lower than 26.4.12 (e.g., 26.4.0 through 26.4.11)
-
Confirm Authorization Services is enabledIn the Keycloak admin console, navigate to the target realm, then to Authorization > Settings. Verify that Enable Authorization Services is turned ONAffected if Authorization Services is enabled for the realm
-
Verify Protection API is configuredIn the Keycloak admin console, go to Authorization > Settings > Protection API. Check if the Resource Server has the Protection API enabled and note the allowed origins and URLsAffected if The Protection API is enabled and accessible (even without explicit client configuration, the API endpoints exist in the authorization endpoint URL path)
-
Check for cross-resource-server access patternsReview application logs and Keycloak audit logs for API calls to /auth/realms/{realm}/protocol/openid-connect/token and subsequent calls to /auth/realms/{realm}/authz/protection/resource_set/{resource_id} where the requesting client differs from the resource's owner Resource ServerAffected if Any authenticated client is able to make GET, PUT, or DELETE calls to resources outside their own Resource Server by directly referencing UUIDs
You are affected if your Keycloak version is 26.4.x and is below 26.4.12 AND you have Authorization Services with the Protection API enabled for any realm.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped26.4.12
Apply vendor patches when available. In the interim, implement compensating controls such as strict validation that resources belong to the requesting client's authorized Resource Server before processing any API request.
Keycloak 26.4.12 or later
- 1. Back up your current Keycloak database and configuration files before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 2. Download Keycloak version 26.4.12 or later from the official Keycloak releases (keycloak.org) or your enterprise repository.
- 3. Stop the running Keycloak instance gracefully to avoid data corruption.
- 4. If using a managed upgrade, run the migration tools provided by your deployment method (e.g., Kubernetes operator, Docker, or manual installation).
- 5. Deploy the new Keycloak 26.4.12 (or later) binaries or container image.
- 6. Start the upgraded Keycloak instance and verify it starts successfully.
- 7. Test the Authorization Services Protection API to confirm the IDOR vulnerability is remediated - verify that cross-resource-server operations are properly denied.
- 8. Verify that existing client configurations and authorization policies still function correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4630 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4630 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data