CVE-2026-4632
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weakness has been identified in itsourcecode Online Enrollment System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /sms/user/index.php?view=add of the component Parameter Handler. Executing a manipulation of the argument Name can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in itsourcecode Online Enrollment System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate the Name parameter in /sms/user/index.php?view=add to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially exposing or manipulating the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the itsourcecode Online Enrollment System is installedCheck your web server document root for the presence of the application. Look for directories like /sms/ or search for files containing 'Online Enrollment System' in headers or comments. Check version files, README files, or configuration files for version number 1.0.Affected if The application directory exists and version 1.0 is confirmed installed.
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint file existsLocate the file /sms/user/index.php within your web server directory structure. This is the affected PHP file mentioned in the CVE.Affected if The file /sms/user/index.php exists in the deployed application.
-
Check if the add user functionality is accessibleTest accessing the URL endpoint /sms/user/index.php?view=add through your web server. This is the specific URL path where the SQL injection occurs.Affected if The URL responds and displays a user addition form or accepts the view=add parameter.
-
Inspect the Name parameter handling in the source codeExamine /sms/user/index.php and look for how the Name parameter from the add user form is processed. Check if it is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements or parameter binding.Affected if The code shows the Name parameter being concatenated directly into SQL queries without sanitization or parameterized queries.
-
Check database interaction for the Name fieldIf you can view application logs or have database query logging enabled, verify whether the Name input is passed to the database without proper escaping or prepared statements.Affected if The Name parameter from user input flows directly to SQL execution without parameterization.
You are affected if you have itsourcecode Online Enrollment System version 1.0 installed with the /sms/user/index.php file present and the add user functionality accessible, where the Name parameter is processed in SQL queries without prepared statements.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement prepared statements/parameterized queries for all user inputs, particularly the Name parameter, and apply input validation/sanitization before database operations.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4632 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data