CVE-2026-46364
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedphpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 contains an unauthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in BuiltinCaptcha::garbageCollector() and BuiltinCaptcha::saveCaptcha() methods that interpolate unsanitized User-Agent headers into DELETE and INSERT queries. Unauthenticated attackers can exploit the public GET /api/captcha endpoint by crafting malicious User-Agent headers to perform time-based blind SQL injection, extracting sensitive data including user credentials, admin tokens, and SMTP credentials from the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencephpMyFAQ before 4.1.2 has an unauthenticated SQL injection in the BuiltinCaptcha class. The garbageCollector() and saveCaptcha() methods directly interpolate the User-Agent HTTP header into DELETE and INSERT queries without sanitization or parameterization. Attackers exploit the public /api/captcha endpoint using crafted User-Agent headers to perform time-based blind SQL injection, extracting sensitive data like user credentials, admin tokens, and SMTP credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify phpMyFAQ versionCheck the version.php file in the phpMyFAQ root directory, or log into the admin dashboard and view the system information page. Common location: /path/to/phpmyfaq/version.php or through Admin > Configuration > System > VersionAffected if The installed version is earlier than 4.1.2 (e.g., 4.1.0, 4.0.x, 3.x.x series)
-
Confirm BuiltinCaptcha is enabledLog into phpMyFAQ admin panel and navigate to Configuration > Security > Captcha. Verify that 'BuiltinCaptcha' or the default built-in captcha system is selected as the active captcha providerAffected if BuiltinCaptcha is selected as the active captcha solution (other providers like reCAPTCHA would not be affected by this specific vulnerability)
-
Check if /api/captcha endpoint is accessibleSend an HTTP request to the /api/captcha endpoint on your phpMyFAQ server. Example: curl -I http://yourserver.com/api/captcha -H 'User-Agent: Test'Affected if The endpoint responds with HTTP 200 or 403 (any response indicating the endpoint exists and is reachable)
-
Inspect BuiltinCaptcha source codeLocate the BuiltinCaptcha class file in your phpMyFAQ installation, typically in src/phpMyFAQ/Captcha/BuiltinCaptcha.php or similar path. Examine the garbageCollector() and saveCaptcha() methods for direct User-Agent interpolationAffected if The code shows direct insertion of $_SERVER['USER_AGENT'] or similar into SQL queries without using prepared statements or parameter binding
Your environment is affected if phpMyFAQ version is before 4.1.2 AND BuiltinCaptcha is the active captcha provider AND the /api/captcha endpoint is publicly accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade phpMyFAQ to version 4.1.2 or later which contains the patch. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, implement input sanitization and parameterized queries for User-Agent handling in the affected captcha methods as a temporary mitigation.
phpMyFAQ 4.1.2 or later
- 1. Identify the current phpMyFAQ installation version by checking the version file or admin dashboard.
- 2. Confirm the installation is running a version prior to 4.1.2.
- 3. Create a full backup of the database and application files before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 4. Download phpMyFAQ version 4.1.2 or the latest stable release from the official repository at https://www.phpmyfaq.de/.
- 5. Follow the official upgrade instructions to replace the application files while preserving configuration and data.
- 6. After upgrading, verify that the /api/captcha endpoint no longer accepts unsanitized User-Agent headers.
- 7. Test that the BuiltinCaptcha::garbageCollector() and BuiltinCaptcha::saveCaptcha() methods properly sanitize or parameterize the User-Agent input.
- 8. Confirm the application functions normally and monitor logs for any suspicious SQL injection attempts.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46364 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46364 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data