CVE-2026-46391
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHAX CMS helps manage microsite universe with PHP or NodeJs backends. Starting in version 9.0.1 and prior to version 26.0.0 of @haxtheweb/open-apis, multiple functions conduct substring-only matching to validate hostnames to which basic authorization should be sent. An attacker can append the matched substrings to an attacker-controlled endpoint and capture authentication. Version 26.0.0 fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHAX CMS @haxtheweb/open-apis versions 9.0.1 through 25.x contain a hostname validation bypass in multiple functions that perform substring-only matching for basic authorization hostnames. Attackers can append matched substrings to attacker-controlled endpoints to intercept authentication credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of @haxtheweb/open-apisRun 'npm list @haxtheweb/open-apis' or check the package.json dependencies for the exact version numberAffected if The version listed is 9.0.1, 9.0.2, 10.x, 11.x, 12.x, 13.x, 14.x, 15.x, 16.x, 17.x, 18.x, 19.x, 20.x, 21.x, 22.x, 23.x, 24.x, or 25.x (any version from 9.0.1 through 25.x inclusive)
-
Verify if basic authorization is configuredSearch configuration files for 'basic', 'authorization', or credential-related settings in your HAX CMS setup; inspect the OpenAPI or API configuration for authentication schemesAffected if Basic authorization or any hostname-dependent authentication is enabled in the configuration
-
Locate hostname validation functions in the codebaseSearch the @haxtheweb/open-apis source code for functions performing hostname or host validation; look for patterns like indexOf, includes, substring, or regex matching used on authorization headers or hostnamesAffected if The code uses substring matching (such as indexOf !== -1, includes, or partial string comparison) rather than exact hostname comparison or proper URL host validation
-
Test for credential interception via hostname substring injectionIf basic auth is used, attempt a request with a hostname that contains a legitimate authorized hostname as a substring (e.g., if 'example.com' is authorized, test with 'example.com.evil.com')Affected if The request succeeds with authentication when the hostname contains the authorized substring but is not the exact hostname
You are affected if @haxtheweb/open-apis version 9.0.1-25.x is installed AND basic authorization is enabled AND the hostname validation relies on substring matching that could allow attacker-controlled hostnames to pass validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade @haxtheweb/open-apis to version 26.0.0 or later. If upgrade is not immediately possible, audit all functions performing hostname validation and replace substring matching with exact hostname matching or proper URL host validation.
@haxtheweb/open-apis version 26.0.0
- Identify the project using @haxtheweb/open-apis package
- Check current installed version with: npm list @haxtheweb/open-apis or yarn list @haxtheweb/open-apis
- Update package.json dependency to ^26.0.0 or the specific version 26.0.0
- Run npm install or yarn install to fetch the fixed version
- Verify the installed version is 26.0.0: npm list @haxtheweb/open-apis
- Test the application functionality to ensure the upgrade does not break existing features
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46391 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46391 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data