CVE-2026-46396
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHAX CMS helps manage microsite universe with PHP or NodeJs backends. A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in versions prior to 26.0.0 due to improper sanitization of `<iframe>` elements. The application allows `javascript:` URIs in the `src` attribute, which are executed when a malicious page is viewed. This enables attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the victim’s browser and access sensitive data exposed to client-side scripts. Version 26.0.0 fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHAX CMS fails to properly sanitize iframe elements, allowing javascript: URIs in the src attribute to be stored and executed. When authenticated users view maliciously crafted content, the javascript: protocol executes arbitrary code in their browser context, enabling session hijacking and sensitive data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed HAX CMS versionLocate the version file (typically version.json, package.json, or in the admin dashboard under Site Settings > About). Compare the version number to the fixed version 26.0.0.Affected if The installed version is lower than 26.0.0 (e.g., 25.x, 24.x, etc.)
-
Identify content authoring capabilitiesDetermine if the CMS allows authenticated users to create or edit content pages, blog posts, or other content types that support embedding HTML elements.Affected if Authenticated users (editors, authors, or lower-privileged users) have the ability to insert or modify HTML/iframe elements in content.
-
Search stored content for iframe elementsQuery the CMS database or inspect content files for occurrences of the <iframe> HTML tag in the content storage (typically a database table like 'nodes', 'content', or flat files in a /content/ directory).Affected if Iframe elements exist in stored content within the CMS.
-
Inspect iframe src attributes for dangerous URI schemesExamine any stored iframe elements and check the src attribute values. Look for URIs beginning with 'javascript:' or other potentially dangerous schemes (e.g., 'javascript:alert()', 'javascript:document.cookie').Affected if Any iframe element has a src attribute containing a javascript: URI scheme.
-
Review recent content edits for suspicious iframesCheck content revision history, audit logs, or recent activity logs for iframe additions, particularly from users who should not normally be embedding iframes.Affected if Recent content contains iframe elements with non-standard or suspicious src values.
You are affected if your HAX CMS installation is version 25.x or lower AND allows authenticated users to create or edit content containing iframe elements, particularly if javascript: URIs are found in stored iframe src attributes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to HAX CMS version 26.0.0 or later which implements proper iframe sanitization to block javascript: and other dangerous URI schemes.
26.0.0
- 1. Back up your current HAX CMS installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Identify your current HAX CMS version by checking the version file or admin dashboard.
- 3. Download HAX CMS version 26.0.0 from the official GitHub repository or release channel.
- 4. Follow the standard upgrade procedure: replace core files while preserving your configuration and content directories.
- 5. Clear any application caches after the upgrade.
- 6. Verify the installation by logging into the admin panel.
- 7. Test that iframe elements with javascript: URIs are now properly sanitized and blocked.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46396 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data