CVE-2026-46521
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to versions 6.9.13-48 and 7.1.2-23, when using LZMA compression in the MIFF encoder an out of bounds write can occur due to a missing check. This issue has been patched in versions 6.9.13-48 and 7.1.2-23.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImageMagick contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the MIFF image encoder when processing LZMA-compressed image data. The issue stems from a missing bounds check that allows memory corruption during decompression, potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.9.13-48>= 7.0.0-0, < 7.1.2-23CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed ImageMagick versionRun `identify -version` (ImageMagick 7) or `convert -version` (ImageMagick 6) to see the exact version numberAffected if Version is below 6.9.13-48, or is 7.x and below 7.1.2-23
-
Verify MIFF format support is presentRun `identify -list format | grep -i miff` to confirm MIFF format is available in the buildAffected if MIFF format appears in the list of supported formats (enabled by default in most builds)
-
Confirm LZMA compression delegate is availableRun `identify -list configure | grep -i lzma` or check for liblzma presence in the ImageMagick configurationAffected if LZMA support is present in the ImageMagick delegate configuration
The environment is affected if ImageMagick version is below the safe thresholds AND both MIFF format and LZMA compression support are enabled in the ImageMagick build.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.9.13-487.1.2-23
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 6.9.13-48 or 7.1.2-23 or later. Until patched, avoid processing untrusted MIFF files with LZMA compression or disable LZMA support in ImageMagick.
6.9.13-48 (for 6.x branch) or 7.1.2-23 (for 7.x branch)
- Check current ImageMagick version using 'convert -version' or 'magick --version'
- If running ImageMagick 6.x (6.9.x): Upgrade to version 6.9.13-48 or later
- If running ImageMagick 7.x (7.0.x or 7.1.x): Upgrade to version 7.1.2-23 or later
- On Debian/Ubuntu: 'sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install imagemagick'
- On RHEL/CentOS/Fedora: 'sudo yum update ImageMagick' or 'sudo dnf update ImageMagick'
- On macOS with Homebrew: 'brew upgrade imagemagick'
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'convert -version' and confirming the installed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46521 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46521 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data