Information ExposureWeakness · CWE-200

CVE-2026-4660

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HashiCorp’s go-getter library up to v1.8.5 may allow arbitrary file reads on the file system during certain git operations through a maliciously crafted URL. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-4660, is fixed in go-getter v1.8.6. This vulnerability does not affect the go-getter/v2 branch and package.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The go-getter library up to v1.8.5 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability where maliciously crafted URLs during git operations can read files from the filesystem outside the intended directory. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to potentially access sensitive files via specially constructed getter URLs.

MitigationUpgrade go-getter to v1.8.6 or later. Review all usage of go-getter in applications to ensure no untrusted URLs can be supplied to getter operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify go-getter in dependencies
    Run 'go list -m all' or inspect go.mod/go.sum files to find go-getter
    Affected if go-getter appears in the dependency list at version 1.8.5 or below
  2. Check installed go-getter version
    Run 'go list -m github.com/hashicorp/go-getter' or check the version in go.mod
    Affected if Version is 1.8.5 or lower, or no version is shown (indicating an unpatched version)
  3. Determine if application performs git operations with URLs
    Review code for usage of go-getter functions that handle git URLs (Get, GetContext, or custom getter setup)
    Affected if The application uses go-getter to fetch from git repositories via URLs
  4. Check if v2 branch is in use
    Search for 'github.com/hashicorp/go-getter/v2' in dependency files or code imports
    Affected if go-getter/v2 is NOT imported; only go-getter v1.x is used (v2 is unaffected)
  5. Verify git executable is available
    Confirm git is installed on systems where go-getter runs (required for git-based URL handling)
    Affected if git is installed and go-getter v1.x with URL-based git operations is in use

Affected if go-getter v1.8.5 or lower is present AND the application uses it to fetch from git URLs; not affected if v1.8.6+ or the v2 branch is used instead.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade go-getter to v1.8.6 or later. Review all usage of go-getter in applications to ensure no untrusted URLs can be supplied to getter operations.

Recommended fix High confidence

go-getter v1.8.6

  1. Identify all projects and dependencies that use the go-getter library (github.com/hashicorp/go-getter) version 1.8.5 or below
  2. Update the go-getter dependency to version 1.8.6 or later in your dependency management system (e.g., go.mod for Go projects)
  3. Run dependency update commands (e.g., go get github.com/hashicorp/[email protected] or go mod tidy)
  4. Rebuild and recompile all affected applications
  5. Redeploy the updated applications to production environments
  6. Verify the fix by testing that git operations through go-getter no longer allow arbitrary file reads
Caveat Security patch release; review the go-getter v1.8.6 changelog for any minor changes, though none are expected to be breaking

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4660 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4660 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data