CVE-2026-4682
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCertain HP DeskJet All in One devices may be vulnerable to remote code execution caused by a buffer overflow when specially crafted Web Services for Devices (WSD) scan requests are improperly validated and handled by the MFP. WSD Scan is a Microsoft Windows–based network scanning protocol that allows a PC to discover scanners (and MFPs) on a network and send scan jobs to them without requiring vendor specific drivers or utilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow in HP DeskJet All-in-One devices when processing specially crafted WSD (Web Services for Devices) scan requests allows remote code execution due to improper input validation during WSD scan request handling.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HP DeskJet All-in-One devices on the networkScan the network for HP DeskJet printer models or check connected devices in the network router/admin console for DeskJet All-in-One listingsAffected if HP DeskJet All-in-One device is present on the network
-
Verify WSD service is enabled on the deviceAccess the printer web interface (typically at its IP address) and navigate to Network Settings or WSD configuration to check if Web Services for Devices is turned onAffected if WSD (Web Services for Devices) is enabled in the printer settings
-
Confirm network accessibility of WSD scan functionalityCheck if the printer is reachable on the network and WSD ports (typically 3702/UDP for discovery and 80/TCP for operations) are openAffected if The device WSD services are accessible from network segments not isolated from untrusted hosts
-
Check if firmware version can be determinedAccess the printer web interface or print a configuration page to view the current firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is unknown or unpatched relative to vendor security advisories
User is affected if they have any HP DeskJet All-in-One device with WSD services enabled and accessible on their network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate affected devices on a restricted network segment, disable WSD services if not required, and apply vendor-provided firmware patches when available.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4682 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4682 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data