CVE-2026-4684
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRace condition, use-after-free in the Graphics: WebRender component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 115.34, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA race condition in Mozilla's WebRender graphics component leads to a use-after-free vulnerability. This occurs when the program attempts to access memory that has already been freed, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution or denial of service. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (HIGH) due to the potential for memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 115.34.0< 149.0>= 128.0, < 140.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, click the menu button (three horizontal lines), select Help, then About Firefox. The version number will display in the window that opens.Affected if The displayed version is less than 115.34.0, OR is 128.0 or higher but less than 140.9.0, OR is 149.0 or higher but less than 149.0 (which means any version below 149.0 that is not 115.34.0 or above is potentially affected)
-
Confirm WebRender is enabledIn the Firefox address bar, navigate to about:support. Look for the "Compositing" entry in the page and check if WebRender is listed as the backend.Affected if WebRender is listed as the active graphics compositor (this is the component with the vulnerability)
-
Check for extended support release (ESR) versionIn about:support, look for the "Version" field. If it contains "ESR", note the full version number (for example, Firefox 115.x ESR).Affected if The ESR version is less than 115.34.0 or is 128.0 through 140.9.0 (older ESR branches before the patched versions)
A user is affected if their Firefox version falls within any of the vulnerable ranges and WebRender is the active compositor.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped115.34.0140.9.0149.0
Apply the vendor-provided patches by updating affected installations to Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 115.34/140.9, Thunderbird 149, or Thunderbird 140.9, or later versions.
Firefox 149 (standard) or Firefox ESR 140.9 / Firefox ESR 115.34 (depending on your release channel)
- 1. Check the currently installed Firefox version by navigating to Menu > Help > About Firefox
- 2. If running Firefox 115.x (ESR), upgrade to Firefox ESR 115.34.0 or later
- 3. If running Firefox 128.x through 140.8.x (ESR), upgrade to Firefox ESR 140.9.0 or later
- 4. If running standard Firefox release prior to 149, upgrade to Firefox 149 or later
- 5. Alternatively, download the latest stable Firefox release from www.mozilla.org
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4684 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data