CVE-2026-4686
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Canvas2D component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 115.34, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a client-side browser vulnerability in Mozilla's Graphics: Canvas2D component involving incorrect boundary conditions. Such flaws typically allow improper memory access during canvas rendering operations, potentially leading to out-of-bounds reads or writes that could be exploited for information disclosure or code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 115.34.0< 149.0>= 128.0, < 140.9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Firefox version numberOpen Firefox, click the menu button (three horizontal lines), select Help, then select About Firefox. The version number is displayed at the top of the window.Affected if The displayed version is less than 115.34.0, or is between 128.0 and 140.8.x inclusive, or is less than 149.0 (depending on which release channel you are on)
-
Verify Canvas2D is enabledIn the Firefox address bar, type about:config and press Enter. Search for the preference named canvas.imageCache.enabled or verify that the Canvas2D rendering feature is operational by default (it is enabled by default in unaltered Firefox installations).Affected if Canvas2D rendering is enabled (this is the default state; the vulnerability affects rendering operations when this feature is active)
-
Confirm you are using standard FirefoxCheck if you are running Firefox (not Firefox ESR or Thunderbird) by looking at the About window - it will simply say Firefox if it is the standard release.Affected if You are running standard Firefox and your version falls within the affected ranges listed above
You are affected if your Firefox version is below 115.34.0, is between 128.0 and 140.8.x, or is below 149.0 and Canvas2D rendering is enabled (the default state).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped115.34.0140.9.0149.0
Upgrade affected installations to Firefox 149+, Firefox ESR 115.34+, Firefox ESR 140.9+, Thunderbird 149+, or Thunderbird 140.9+ as listed in the official advisory.
Firefox 149 (standard) or Firefox ESR 115.34/140.9 (depending on release channel)
- Check current Firefox version via Help > About Firefox
- For Firefox versions < 115.34.0 on ESR 115.x: upgrade to Firefox ESR 115.34
- For Firefox versions < 149.0 on standard release: upgrade to Firefox 149
- For Firefox versions >= 128.0 and < 140.9.0: upgrade to Firefox ESR 140.9
- Restart Firefox after upgrade
- Verify the fix by checking Help > About Firefox shows the corrected version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4686 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4686 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data