CVE-2026-46877
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: VMSVGA device). The supported version that is affected is 7.2.8. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.0 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a vulnerability in Oracle VM VirtualBox's emulated VMSVGA (VMware SVGA) graphics device. The vulnerability allows a high-privileged attacker with local system access to potentially read sensitive data from the VirtualBox environment. The VMSVGA device is the emulated graphics adapter used for VMware-compatible graphics in virtual machines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.2.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify VirtualBox installation and versionRun 'vboxmanage --version' on the host system to retrieve the installed VirtualBox version numberAffected if The installed version is exactly 7.2.8
-
Identify VirtualBox installation pathCheck common installation directories (C:\Program Files\Oracle\VirtualBox on Windows or /usr/lib/virtualbox on Linux) for VirtualBox binaries and verify version via 'VBoxManage --version' outputAffected if VirtualBox 7.2.8 binaries are present on the system
-
Locate configured virtual machinesRun 'vboxmanage list vms' to enumerate all registered virtual machines on the hostAffected if Any virtual machines are registered with this VirtualBox installation
-
Inspect VM graphics device configurationFor each VM, run 'vboxmanage showvminfo <vmname>' and look for the 'Graphics Controller' setting under the display or video configuration section. Check if the controller type is set to VMSVGA or VMware SVGAAffected if Any virtual machine has its graphics controller configured to use the VMSVGA (VMware SVGA) device
A system is affected if it runs Oracle VM VirtualBox version 7.2.8 with at least one virtual machine configured to use the VMSVGA graphics controller, allowing a high-privileged local attacker to potentially read sensitive data through the emulated device.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Oracle security patch for VirtualBox 7.2.8 when released. Until then, limit physical/logical access to the VirtualBox host systems and monitor for suspicious activity.
VirtualBox 7.2.9 or latest 7.2.x stable release
- 1. Identify the current Oracle VM VirtualBox version installed by checking Help > About VirtualBox or running 'VBoxManage --version'
- 2. Navigate to the Oracle VirtualBox official downloads page at https://www.oracle.com/virtualization/virtualbox/
- 3. Download the latest VirtualBox 7.2.x release (or a later stable release if available) for your host operating system
- 4. Ensure all virtual machines are powered off (not saved state) before upgrading
- 5. Run the VirtualBox installer and follow the prompts to upgrade the installation
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new version by running 'VBoxManage --version' to confirm installation was successful
- 7. Test that critical virtual machines start and operate normally post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46877 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46877 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data