CVE-2026-4695
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect boundary conditions in the Audio/Video: Web Codecs component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA boundary condition vulnerability in the Web Codecs component of Firefox and Thunderbird allows incorrect memory access during audio/video encoding or decoding operations. This type of flaw typically involves improper bounds checking that could lead to out-of-bounds read/write operations, potentially enabling memory corruption or information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 140.9.0< 149.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Firefox or Thunderbird versionIn Firefox: Go to Menu > Help > About Firefox. In Thunderbird: Go to Menu > Help > About Thunderbird. The version number is displayed in the window that opens.Affected if The displayed version is below 149.0 (for standard releases) or below 140.9.0 (for ESR releases)
-
Confirm the Web Codecs API is in useCheck if the application processes web-based audio or video content, or inspect browser console for Web Codecs API usage (e.g., 'VideoDecoder', 'AudioDecoder' JavaScript calls) in any loaded web pages or extensions.Affected if The Web Codecs API is actively being used to decode audio or video content
-
Check for third-party extensions using Web CodecsReview installed extensions for any that handle media processing, video editing, or audio manipulation, as these may invoke Web Codecs APIs.Affected if Extensions that leverage the Web Codecs component are installed and active
If the installed Firefox version is below 149.0 (or ESR below 140.9.0) AND the Web Codecs API is being actively used to process media, the environment is likely affected by this boundary condition vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped140.9.0149.0
Update affected installations to Firefox 149+, Firefox ESR 140.9+, Thunderbird 149+, or Thunderbird 140.9+ to obtain the patched version of the Web Codecs component.
Firefox 149.0 (or Firefox ESR 140.9)
- 1. Open Firefox and navigate to Menu > Help > About Firefox (or go to about:support)
- 2. Click 'Check for Updates' or let automatic checking occur
- 3. If an update is available, click 'Download the Update' and wait for it to complete
- 4. Click 'Restart to update Firefox' when prompted
- 5. After restart, verify the version by going to Menu > Help > About Firefox - confirm version 149.0 or later (or 140.9 for ESR)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- bugzilla.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- www.mozilla.org
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4695 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data