SolarisOperating system · Oracle

CVE-2026-46978

CRITICAL · 10.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: Remote Administration Daemon). The supported version that is affected is 11.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Solaris. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Solaris, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Solaris accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Solaris accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the Remote Administration Daemon in Oracle Solaris 11.4 via HTTPS to achieve full compromise of confidentiality and integrity, with scope expansion to affect additional products. The vulnerability requires no privileges or user interaction and has low attack complexity.

MitigationApply Oracle's critical patch update for CVE-2026-46978 to Oracle Solaris 11.4; if unavailable, disable or restrict the Remote Administration Daemon from untrusted networks and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SolarisOperating system
Affected:= 11.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Oracle Solaris 11.4 is installed
    Run 'cat /etc/release' or 'uname -a' to identify the installed Oracle Solaris version
    Affected if The version shown is Oracle Solaris 11.4
  2. Determine if RAD service is enabled
    Run 'svcs -a | grep rad' or 'svcs rad' to check if the Remote Administration Daemon service is enabled/online
    Affected if The rad service shows as 'online' or 'enabled'
  3. Check if RAD is listening on network ports
    Run 'netstat -an | grep 3007' or 'sockstat | grep rad' to see if RAD is bound to network interfaces (port 3007 is the default RAD HTTPS port)
    Affected if Port 3007 (or other RAD ports) shows as LISTEN on 0.0.0.0 or external interface addresses
  4. Verify RAD HTTPS service is exposed
    Run 'svcs -l rad' and inspect the 'net_address' or 'port' values, or check '/etc/rad.conf' if it exists, to see what interfaces RAD binds to
    Affected if RAD is bound to non-loopback addresses (0.0.0.0 or specific IP rather than 127.0.0.1)

If running Oracle Solaris 11.4 with the RAD service online and exposed on network-accessible ports (especially 3007/HTTPS), the system is affected by this unauthenticated remote vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Oracle's critical patch update for CVE-2026-46978 to Oracle Solaris 11.4; if unavailable, disable or restrict the Remote Administration Daemon from untrusted networks and implement network segmentation to limit exposure.

Fix this in Solaris Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-46978 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-46978 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data