CVE-2026-47129
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNextCRM is open-source customer relationship management (CRM) software. Versions prior to 0.12.0 have a Broken Access Control (BAC) vulnerability in the `activateUser` and `deactivateUser` Next.js Server Actions of NextCRM. The application fails to verify if the requesting user holds the `admin` role. Consequently, any authenticated user (even those with the lowest `member` or `viewer` roles) can arbitrarily activate or deactivate any user account in the system, including the main administrator. Version 0.12.0 fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNextCRM versions prior to 0.12.0 contain a Broken Access Control (BAC) vulnerability in the `activateUser` and `deactivateUser` Next.js Server Actions. The application fails to verify if the requesting user holds the admin role, allowing any authenticated user (including those with the lowest `member` or `viewer` roles) to arbitrarily activate or deactivate any user account in the system, including the main administrator account.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check NextCRM versionLocate the package.json file in the NextCRM installation directory and examine the 'version' field, or run 'npm list nextcrm' or 'cat package.json | grep version' to identify the installed versionAffected if Version is prior to 0.12.0 (e.g., 0.11.x, 0.10.x, etc.)
-
Identify Server Action filesSearch the codebase for files containing 'activateUser' and 'deactivateUser' function definitions, typically in actions/ or server/actions/ directories using 'grep -r "activateUser" .' or 'grep -r "deactivateUser" .'Affected if These server action functions exist in the codebase (vulnerable versions contain them)
-
Examine authorization logic in Server ActionsOpen the activateUser and deactivateUser server action files and inspect the code for role verification (e.g., checks for 'admin', 'isAdmin', or role-based access control middleware) before performing user activation/deactivationAffected if No role check exists, or the functions allow execution by any authenticated user regardless of role
-
Verify role assignment configurationReview the user role definitions in the database or configuration files to confirm that 'member' or 'viewer' role types exist and can be assigned to usersAffected if The system defines roles below admin level (member, viewer) that could exploit the lack of authorization checks
If NextCRM version is below 0.12.0 AND the activateUser/deactivateUser server actions lack proper admin role verification, the environment is vulnerable to privilege escalation via broken access control.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to NextCRM version 0.12.0 or later, which adds proper role verification to prevent unauthorized user activation/deactivation. If upgrading is not possible immediately, temporarily disable the affected Server Actions until the patch can be applied.
0.12.0
- Backup the current NextCRM installation and database before proceeding with the upgrade
- Identify the current installed version of NextCRM (e.g., check package.json, git tags, or the installed npm package)
- Upgrade NextCRM to version 0.12.0 by running the appropriate package manager command (e.g., npm install [email protected] or pip install nextcrm==0.12.0, depending on the installation method)
- If using a Git-based deployment, pull the version 0.12.0 release tag or branch
- Run any database migrations that may be required for this release
- Restart the NextCRM application services
- Verify that the upgrade was successful by checking the application version
- Test that the activateUser and deactivateUser server actions now properly enforce admin role authorization
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47129 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47129 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data