CVE-2026-47159
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. Prior to 1.36.0, Vaultwarden's SSO discovery and pre-validation flow returned organization-related SSO metadata including organizationIdentifier values for arbitrary email addresses and allowed a valid pre-validation JWT to be obtained with only the discovered identifier, enabling SSO-enabled organization enumeration and authentication workflow abuse. This issue is fixed in version 1.36.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVaultwarden versions before 1.36.0 have an insecure SSO discovery endpoint that returns organization-related SSO metadata (including organizationIdentifier values) for arbitrary email addresses without authentication. This allows unauthenticated attackers to enumerate SSO-enabled organizations and obtain valid pre-validation JWTs using only the discovered identifier, enabling authentication workflow abuse.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Vaultwarden installation and versionLocate the Vaultwarden instance (typically a Docker container or running binary) and check its version, usually visible on the admin dashboard or via the API version endpointAffected if The installed version is below 1.36.0
-
Determine if SSO (Single Sign-On) is enabledInspect the Vaultwarden configuration files or environment variables (such as .env or config.yml) for SSO-related settings like sso_enabled, oidc_configuration, or similar SSO provider flagsAffected if SSO configuration is present and enabled in the Vaultwarden deployment
-
Test the SSO discovery endpoint for unauthenticated accessSend an HTTP GET request to the SSO discovery endpoint with an arbitrary email address (e.g., using curl: curl -k https://your-vaultwarden-url/sso/[email protected]) and observe if organization SSO metadata is returned without requiring authenticationAffected if The endpoint returns organizationIdentifier values or SSO metadata for arbitrary email addresses without any authentication credentials
-
Verify pre-validation JWT generationIf the discovery endpoint responds, examine whether the response contains or allows generation of pre-validation JWT tokens using the discovered organizationIdentifierAffected if Valid pre-validation JWTs can be obtained without authenticating, using identifiers from the discovery endpoint
A user is affected if Vaultwarden version is below 1.36.0, SSO is enabled, and the SSO discovery endpoint returns organization metadata for unauthenticated requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Vaultwarden to version 1.36.0 or later to remediate the SSO metadata exposure and authentication bypass. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider restricting access to the SSO discovery endpoints via network-level controls.
Vaultwarden version 1.36.0
- 1. Backup your Vaultwarden data directory and any configuration files before upgrading
- 2. If using Docker, pull the latest Vaultwarden image with tag 1.36.0 or later: `docker pull vaultwarden/server:1.36.0`
- 3. Stop the currently running Vaultwarden container
- 4. Start the new container with the same configuration and mounted volumes
- 5. Verify the service is running correctly by accessing the web interface
- 6. Test that SSO authentication flows work as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47159 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data