Deserialization of Untrusted DataWeakness · CWE-502

CVE-2026-47472

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click 5 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM contains a vulnerability in its inter-process communication layer where an attacker with local same-user access could cause deserialization. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, information disclosure, data tampering, and denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM contains a deserialization vulnerability in its inter-process communication (IPC) layer. An attacker with local access to the same user account can exploit the insecure IPC channel to deserialize malicious data, potentially achieving code execution, leaking sensitive information, tampering with data, or causing denial of service.

MitigationApply the NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM security patch when available. Until then, restrict local access to the system, apply least-privilege principles to user accounts running TensorRT-LLM, and consider network isolation if the IPC layer has any network exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if TensorRT-LLM is installed
    Run command: pip show tensorrt-llm or check for tensorrt_llm Python package; alternatively, search for /usr/local/tensorrt_llm or /opt/nvidia/tensorrt_llm directories
    Affected if TensorRT-LLM is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed TensorRT-LLM version
    Run: pip show tensorrt-llm | grep Version, or import tensorrt_llm and print(tensorrt_llm.__version__)
    Affected if The installed version has not received the CVE-2026-47472 patch (compare against any official NVIDIA advisory version)
  3. Verify if IPC functionality is enabled
    Check TensorRT-LLM configuration files (e.g., in the working directory or /etc/tensorrt_llm/) for settings related to ipc_enabled, ipc_channel, or inter_process_communication; also inspect any launcher scripts for --ipc or --use_ipc flags
    Affected if IPC is explicitly enabled or defaults to enabled in the configuration
  4. Inspect active IPC channels and sockets
    List temporary/shared memory regions: ls -la /dev/shm/ and check for tensorrt_llm IPC socket files; run: ps aux | grep tensorrt_llm to see running processes and their IPC endpoints
    Affected if IPC sockets or shared memory files owned by the tensorrt_llm process are present and accessible to other local users in the same account group
  5. Check user isolation and access controls
    Review file permissions on IPC-related directories: ls -la /tmp/tensorrt_llm* and /dev/shm/*tensorrt*; verify which users have access to these IPC channels
    Affected if Other local users in the same account can read/write to the IPC channels (permissions are overly permissive, e.g., 777 or shared group)

If TensorRT-LLM is installed with IPC functionality enabled and other local users can access the IPC channels, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2026-47472.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM security patch when available. Until then, restrict local access to the system, apply least-privilege principles to user accounts running TensorRT-LLM, and consider network isolation if the IPC layer has any network exposure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47472 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47472 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data