dbcve.org
Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2026-4767

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in TR7 Cyber ​​Defense Inc. WAF-ASP allows Authentication Abuse. This issue affects WAF-ASP: from v1.0.324.900 before v1.4.0.117.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authentication in TR7 Cyber Defense WAF-ASP allows unauthenticated attackers to access critical functions, enabling authentication abuse. This affects versions from v1.0.324.900 before v1.4.0.117. The vulnerability has a critical CVSS score of 9.8, indicating remote unauthenticated attackers can compromise the WAF's security functions.

MitigationUpgrade WAF-ASP to version 1.4.0.117 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to the WAF management interface using network segmentation and firewall rules.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate TR7 Cyber Defense WAF-ASP installation and version
    Check the WAF-ASP installation directory for a version file, or run the WAF-ASP version command if available from the command line. Common locations include the installation root directory or the product's about/info panel in the management interface.
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is not visible
  2. Compare installed version against affected range
    Compare your identified WAF-ASP version against the vulnerable range: v1.0.324.900 through v1.4.0.116. Versions v1.0.324.900 and higher but below v1.4.0.117 are affected.
    Affected if The installed version falls within v1.0.324.900 to v1.4.0.116 inclusive
  3. Verify WAF management interface accessibility
    Determine if the WAF-ASP management interface is network-accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, network ACLs, or binding configurations that control access to the WAF management ports.
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted or external networks without proper access controls
  4. Confirm authentication enforcement on critical functions
    Test access to critical WAF-ASP administrative functions without providing credentials. Attempt to access API endpoints or management functions that should require authentication.
    Affected if Unauthenticated access to critical WAF functions is successful

The environment is affected if the installed WAF-ASP version is v1.0.324.900 or higher but lower than v1.4.0.117, and the management interface or critical functions are accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade WAF-ASP to version 1.4.0.117 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict network access to the WAF management interface using network segmentation and firewall rules.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

v1.4.0.117 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current installed version of WAF-ASP
  2. 2. Download WAF-ASP version 1.4.0.117 or a later stable release from the vendor
  3. 3. Back up the current WAF-ASP configuration and database
  4. 4. Stop the WAF-ASP service
  5. 5. Install the upgraded WAF-ASP version (v1.4.0.117 or later)
  6. 6. Restore the backed-up configuration
  7. 7. Start the WAF-ASP service
  8. 8. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4767 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4767 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data