Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-4772

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable 7 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in TR7 Cyber ​​Defense Inc. WAF-ASP allows Stored XSS. This issue affects WAF-ASP: from v1.0.324.900 before v1.4.0.117.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Stored XSS vulnerability in TR7 Cyber Defense Inc. WAF-ASP allows attackers to inject malicious scripts through unsanitized input that gets stored and rendered to other users. The flaw exists due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation in versions v1.0.324.900 through v1.4.0.116.

MitigationUpgrade WAF-ASP to v1.4.0.117 or later which contains the fix. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement additional input validation and output encoding at the application layer as a compensating control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm WAF-ASP installation
    Locate and identify the TR7 Cyber Defense Inc. WAF-ASP installation in your environment. Check for the product name in installed software, services, or documentation.
    Affected if WAF-ASP from TR7 Cyber Defense Inc. is not present in the environment
  2. Determine installed version
    Access the WAF-ASP administrative interface or check the product installation directory for version information. Common methods include: logging into the admin dashboard and viewing 'About' or 'System Info' pages, or checking version files in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is v1.0.324.900, v1.4.0.116, or any version in between (e.g., v1.2.0.500, v1.3.5.200)
  3. Verify web interface is accessible
    Confirm that the WAF-ASP web management interface is accessible to users or administrators. Attempt to reach the login page or API endpoints.
    Affected if The web interface is exposed and accepts user input in any feature
  4. Identify user input functionality
    Review the WAF-ASP web interface for features that accept and store user-provided data such as policy names, rule descriptions, custom signatures, or configuration labels.
    Affected if Any feature stores user-supplied input that is later displayed to other users without sanitization

The environment is affected if the installed WAF-ASP version falls within the range v1.0.324.900 through v1.4.0.116 and the web interface with user input functionality is enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade WAF-ASP to v1.4.0.117 or later which contains the fix. If immediate upgrade is not possible, implement additional input validation and output encoding at the application layer as a compensating control.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

v1.4.0.117 or later

  1. 1. Check the current installed version of WAF-ASP to confirm it falls within the affected range (v1.0.324.900 to v1.4.0.116)
  2. 2. Create a complete backup of the current WAF-ASP configuration and any associated data
  3. 3. Download the fixed version v1.4.0.117 or later from the official vendor (TR7 Cyber Defense Inc.)
  4. 4. Follow the vendor's documented upgrade procedure to install the fixed version
  5. 5. After upgrade, verify the new version is correctly installed
  6. 6. Test that the XSS vulnerability is no longer present by attempting to inject stored XSS payloads through the affected input fields
  7. 7. Monitor for any issues after the upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4772 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4772 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data