CVE-2026-47739
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFrappe is a full-stack web application framework. Prior to versions 15.106.0 and 16.16.0, stored XSS in Note was possible due to lack of sanitization. This issue has been patched in versions 15.106.0 and 16.16.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Frappe's Note feature due to lack of input sanitization, allowing malicious scripts to be stored and executed when other users view the notes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Frappe versionRetrieve the current Frappe framework version using the bench command-line tool (e.g., bench version) or via the system information interfaceAffected if The installed version is below 15.106.0 or below 16.16.0 (if running version 16)
-
Confirm Note feature is accessibleVerify the Note module is enabled and accessible to users in the Frappe system settings or by attempting to access the Notes list viewAffected if The Note module is enabled and users can create or view notes
-
Review existing notes for unsanitized contentExamine stored Note records in the database or through the Notes interface for presence of raw HTML tags, script tags, or JavaScript event handlers in the contentAffected if Notes contain unescaped HTML or script elements that would execute when viewed
The environment is affected if the installed Frappe version is below 15.106.0 or 16.16.0 and the Note feature is active with user-created content that may contain unsanitized input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Frappe to version 15.106.0 or 16.16.0 which includes the patch for input sanitization in the Note feature.
15.106.0 (for v15) or 16.16.0 (for v16)
- Identify current Frappe version (bench version command or check bench_manager)
- If running Frappe version 15.x, upgrade to version 15.106.0
- If running Frappe version 16.x, upgrade to version 16.16.0
- Run bench migrate after upgrading to apply database changes
- Clear cache (bench clear-cache)
- Test Note functionality to verify the XSS fix is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47739 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47739 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data