CVE-2026-47846
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBitnami Cassandra container images are affected by a retained default superuser vulnerability. When a custom administrator account is configured via the CASSANDRA_USER environment variable, the container initialization script creates the new superuser account but fails to drop the built-in cassandra account in certain scenarios. This leaves the default cassandra:cassandra superuser active as an unintended access path. Affected versions — Container image: 4.0.x prior to 4.0.20-photon-5-r7; 4.1.x prior to 4.1.11-photon-5-r7; 5.0.x prior to 5.0.8-photon-5-r4 / 5.0.8-debian-12-r3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBitnami Cassandra container images contain a default cassandra superuser account that should be removed when a custom administrator is configured via CASSANDRA_USER. The container initialization script fails to drop the built-in account in certain scenarios, leaving the default cassandra:cassandra credentials active as an unintended privileged access vector.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Bitnami Cassandra container imageRun 'docker images' or 'crictl images' to list container images and look for 'bitnami/cassandra' or 'bitnami/cassandra-rf' naming patternAffected if Image name contains bitnami/cassandra
-
Check Cassandra versionRun 'docker exec <container> cassandra -v' or 'crictl exec <container> cassandra -v' to get the installed Cassandra version, then compare against affected versions 4.0.x (<4.0.20), 4.1.x (<4.1.11), or 5.0.x (<5.0.8)Affected if Installed version falls below 4.0.20, 4.1.11, or 5.0.8 in the respective branches
-
Verify if CASSANDRA_USER was configuredCheck container environment variables by running 'docker inspect <container>' or 'crictl inspect <container>' and look for CASSANDRA_USER variable; if set, custom user creation was intendedAffected if CASSANDRA_USER is set but the default cassandra account may still be present
-
Check if default cassandra user existsConnect to Cassandra with cqlsh inside the container ('docker exec <container> cqlsh -u cassandra -p cassandra') using default credentials; if authentication succeeds, the default account is activeAffected if Authentication succeeds with default username 'cassandra' and password 'cassandra' credentials
-
Inspect authentication configurationCheck Cassandra config: 'docker exec <container> cat /opt/bitnami/cassandra/conf/cassandra.yaml' and look for authenticator setting; verify whether password authentication is enabledAffected if Authenticator is set to PasswordAuthenticator and default cassandra user can still authenticate
A user is affected if running an unpatched Bitnami Cassandra container image version below 4.0.20/4.1.11/5.0.8, configured CASSANDRA_USER but the default cassandra:cassandra superuser account remains accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade affected Bitnami Cassandra container images to patched versions (4.0.20-photon-5-r7+, 4.1.11-photon-5-r7+, or 5.0.8-photon-5-r4+/5.0.8-debian-12-r3+) and verify the default cassandra account is dropped when using custom users.
Upgrade to 4.0.20-photon-5-r7 / 4.1.11-photon-5-r7 / 5.0.8-photon-5-r4 / 5.0.8-debian-12-r3 or later depending on your major version branch
- 1. Identify the currently deployed Bitnami Cassandra container image version using 'docker images' or your container orchestration tooling
- 2. Determine which base OS variant is in use (Photon or Debian) by checking the image tag
- 3. For 4.0.x images: upgrade to version 4.0.20-photon-5-r7 or later
- 4. For 4.1.x images: upgrade to version 4.1.11-photon-5-r7 or later
- 5. For 5.0.x Photon-based images: upgrade to version 5.0.8-photon-5-r4 or later
- 6. For 5.0.x Debian-based images: upgrade to version 5.0.8-debian-12-r3 or later
- 7. Update container image references in your deployment manifests (Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, Kubernetes manifests, etc.)
- 8. Pull the new image and redeploy the Cassandra containers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47846 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47846 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data