CVE-2026-47935
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, and 2026.04 and earlier contain a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. Attackers can manipulate the DOM environment through a crafted webpage to execute malicious JavaScript in the victim's browser. This is a reflected XSS requiring user interaction where the victim must visit the attacker's malicious page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.25.0< 2026.5.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed AEM versionAccess the AEM Welcome page, or append '/libs/cq/core/content/info.xml' to your AEM base URL, or check the 'About Adobe Experience Manager' section in the system consoleAffected if The version displayed is 6.5.24 or lower, or falls within the 6.5.x LTS SP1 line before 6.5.25.0, or is 2026.04 or lower before the 2026.5.0 release
-
Verify the exact 6.5.x release numberIf running a 6.5.x release, confirm the full version number from the same version information endpoint used in step 1Affected if The version is 6.5.0 through 6.5.24 (any 6.5.x version below 6.5.25.0)
-
Verify the 2026.x release numberIf running a 2026.x release, confirm the specific minor version from the version information endpointAffected if The version is 2026.04 or any earlier 2026.x release (before 2026.5.0)
-
Confirm user-facing AEM accessVerify that the AEM instance is accessible to end users or authors who could potentially click malicious linksAffected if The instance serves content to users via web browsers, as this is a client-side XSS requiring victim interaction
You are affected if your AEM version falls below 6.5.25.0 on the 6.5.x line, or below 2026.5.0 on the 2026.x line, and users can access the instance via a browser.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.25.02026.5.0
Apply the vendor patch for CVE-2026-47935 to the affected AEM installation. Until patched, restrict user access to untrusted external sites and implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.
6.5.25.0 or later (LTS track); 2026.5.0 or later (2026 track)
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the product console or version information.
- 2. If running 6.5.x version before 6.5.25.0, plan an upgrade to version 6.5.25.0 or later.
- 3. If running 2026.x version before 2026.5.0, plan an upgrade to version 2026.5.0 or later.
- 4. Before upgrading, review Adobe's upgrade documentation and perform a backup of the current environment.
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before deploying to production.
- 6. Apply the upgrade following Adobe's standard upgrade procedures.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved and the system functions correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47935 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47935 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data