CVE-2026-47951
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager allows low-privileged attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. When victims browse to pages containing these compromised fields, the malicious script executes in their browsers. The scope change indicates the vulnerability impacts resources beyond the vulnerable component itself.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.25.0< 2026.5.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine AEM product versionAccess the AEM system information console or check the version file in the installation directory to identify the exact installed versionAffected if The installed version is earlier than 6.5.25.0, earlier than 2026.5.0, or matches version 6.5 (6.5.24 and earlier, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier)
-
Identify if Forms module is enabledReview the AEM Forms configuration through the Felix console or forms endpoint to determine if the Forms feature is installed and activeAffected if Forms module is enabled and form creation is permitted in the environment
-
Inspect form field validation settingsExamine the form field definitions within AEM Forms through the form editor or configuration to verify whether input validation rules and output encoding are applied to user-editable form fieldsAffected if Form fields do not have input validation or output encoding/sanitization configured
-
Check Content Security Policy configurationReview the dispatcher configuration or web server settings to inspect whether CSP headers are defined and whether they restrict inline script executionAffected if CSP headers are missing or configured to allow inline scripts (script-src 'unsafe-inline')
The environment is affected if running a vulnerable AEM version (before 6.5.25.0 or 2026.5.0) and Forms are in use without proper input validation and output encoding on form fields accessible to low-privilege users
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.25.02026.5.0
Apply Adobe's security patch for AEM versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, or 2026.04 and later. Additionally, implement robust input validation and output encoding on all form fields to prevent script injection.
Upgrade to AEM 6.5.25.0 (for 6.5.x branch) or 2026.5.0 (for 2026.x branch)
- Review Adobe Experience Manager release notes for version 6.5.25.0 or 2026.5.0 to understand changes and prerequisites
- Create a full backup of the current AEM instance including repository, database, and configurations
- Set up a staging environment mirroring production to test the upgrade
- Stop the AEM instance and run the upgrade to version 6.5.25.0 (for 6.5.x branches) or 2026.5.0 (for 2026.x branches)
- Verify all custom workflows, integrations, and third-party plugins are compatible with the new version
- Test the fix by attempting to inject malicious scripts into form fields to confirm XSS is mitigated
- Deploy the validated upgrade to production environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47951 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47951 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data