CVE-2026-47974
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier contain a stored XSS vulnerability where low-privileged users can inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The malicious payload persists in the system and executes in victims' browsers when they view the affected page. The scope change indicates the vulnerability impacts resources beyond the vulnerable AEM component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.25.0< 2026.5.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate AEM version informationAccess the AEM System Information console at /system/console/status-productinfo or check the crx-quickstart/etc/version.properties file for the product version stringAffected if The displayed version is < 6.5.25.0 for 6.5.x releases, < 2026.5.0 for 2026.x releases, or exactly 6.5 without any service pack applied
-
Confirm AEM release trackIdentify whether the installation is on the LTS (6.5.x) or quarterly (2026.x) release track by reviewing the version number formatAffected if The version indicates 6.5.x without reaching 6.5.25.0, or a 2026.x release before 2026.5.0
-
Verify service pack statusIn the AEM Package Manager at /crx/packmgr/list.jsp, review installed service packs and compare against version 6.5.25 (LTS SP2) or confirm no cumulative fix pack reaching 6.5.25 is installedAffected if No service pack at version 6.5.25 or later is installed on a 6.5 base release, leaving the version vulnerable
-
Identify exposed form componentsReview form field components in AEM authored pages that accept user input, particularly those without explicit output encoding or custom validation rulesAffected if Form fields exist that could store unsanitized content exploitable for stored XSS when rendered to other users
You are affected if your AEM installation version is 6.5.x before 6.5.25.0, 2026.x before 2026.5.0, or exactly 6.5 without the corresponding service pack applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.25.02026.5.0
Upgrade to the latest AEM version or apply the vendor-provided patch. Implement output encoding and input validation on affected form fields as an additional defense layer.
AEM 6.5.25.0 or later for 6.5.x LTS line; AEM 2026.5.0 or later for 2026.x release line
- 1. Back up the current AEM instance, including repository content, configuration, and custom code.
- 2. Review Adobe Experience Manager upgrade documentation for your current version to ensure compatibility with the target version.
- 3. Download Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.25.0 (or later 6.5.x LTS release) or 2026.5.0 (or later) from the Adobe distribution portal.
- 4. Stop the running AEM instance.
- 5. Install the new AEM version using the appropriate method (JAR file installation or upgrade package).
- 6. After installation, verify all custom bundles, workflows, and integrations function correctly.
- 7. Test the specific form fields that were vulnerable to ensure the XSS vulnerability is remediated.
- 8. Restart the AEM instance and verify normal operations.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-47974 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-47974 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data