SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-4798

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Avada Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based SQL Injection via the ‘product_order’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.15.1 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. Note: The vulnerability can only be exploited if WooCommerce was previously used and then deactivated.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Avada Builder WordPress plugin has a time-based SQL Injection vulnerability in versions up to 3.15.1. The 'product_order' parameter is not properly escaped and the existing SQL query lacks prepared statements, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL. Exploitation requires WooCommerce to have been previously installed and then deactivated.

MitigationUpdate Avada Builder to version 3.15.2 or later. If immediate update is not possible, consider disabling the plugin or implementing a WAF rule to block SQLi attempts on the product_order parameter.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Avada Builder is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate 'Avada Builder'. Check the version number displayed under the plugin name.
    Affected if The installed version is 3.15.1 or earlier (versions up to and including 3.15.1 are affected)
  2. Verify WooCommerce installation status
    Check WordPress plugins page for WooCommerce. Look for it in the plugins list - it may show as deactivated. Alternatively, check the wp_options database table for WooCommerce-related records that indicate prior installation.
    Affected if WooCommerce was previously installed and is now deactivated (this condition must be true for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
  3. Check for Avada Builder's WooCommerce integration
    If Avada Builder is active, navigate to Avada > WooCommerce in the WordPress admin dashboard. Look for any product order or product grid settings that utilize the 'product_order' parameter.
    Affected if The product_order parameter is exposed through Avada Builder's WooCommerce integration and the site uses product ordering features
  4. Review web server logs for SQL injection attempts
    Examine HTTP access logs for requests containing 'product_order' parameter with suspicious SQL payloads, especially time-based sleep() or benchmark() functions commonly used in SQLi exploitation.
    Affected if Malicious SQL injection attempts targeting the product_order parameter are present in logs

A user is affected if Avada Builder version 3.15.1 or earlier is installed, WooCommerce was previously installed and is now deactivated, and the product_order parameter is accessible through Avada Builder's WooCommerce integration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Avada Builder to version 3.15.2 or later. If immediate update is not possible, consider disabling the plugin or implementing a WAF rule to block SQLi attempts on the product_order parameter.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4798 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data