CVE-2026-4801
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks – CoBlocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via external iCal feed data in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.16 due to insufficient output escaping of event titles, descriptions, and locations fetched from external iCal feeds in the Events block rendering function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe CoBlocks WordPress plugin up to version 3.1.16 contains a stored XSS vulnerability in its Events block. The plugin fails to properly escape event titles, descriptions, and locations fetched from external iCal feeds before rendering them in HTML. Authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access can inject malicious scripts via crafted iCal data that execute when users view affected event pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm CoBlocks plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate CoBlocks. Note the installed version number.Affected if CoBlocks plugin is installed and version is 3.1.16 or lower
-
Check if Events block is in useReview pages, posts, or widgets that contain the CoBlocks Events block. Search for 'coblocks/events' or 'coblocks-event' in the database wp_posts table or use a site search for the block.Affected if The Events block is present on any published content
-
Identify configured iCal feedsEdit any page/post containing the Events block and check if an external iCal feed URL is configured in the block settings. Alternatively, search the database for iCal URLs in postmeta where meta_key contains 'coblocks' and meta_value contains 'http' or '.ics'.Affected if An external iCal feed URL is connected to any Events block on the site
-
Inspect stored event data for injected scriptsQuery the wp_posts and wp_postmeta tables for event entries from iCal feeds. Look for script tags, javascript: URIs, onload/onerror attributes, or other XSS patterns in title, description, or location fields.Affected if Any event data contains unsanitized HTML or script injection attempts
-
Verify user role permissionsReview user roles on the site. Go to Users > All Users and check if any users have the Contributor role, as Contributors can access the Events block.Affected if Contributor-level users exist and have access to create or edit content with the Events block
The environment is affected if CoBlocks version 3.1.16 or lower is installed, the Events block is in use with an iCal feed configured, and Contributors can access content editing capabilities.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to the latest version of CoBlocks when released. Until then, restrict Contributor-level access to the Events block, validate/sanitize iCal feed data server-side before rendering, or implement Content Security Policy headers.
CoBlocks version 3.1.17 or higher
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 3. Locate the CoBlocks (Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks – CoBlocks) plugin
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to update to the latest version
- 5. Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/coblocks/ and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- 6. After updating, verify the plugin version is 3.1.17 or higher
- 7. Test the Events block functionality to ensure the iCal feed import still works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4801 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org
- www.wordfence.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4801 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data