CVE-2026-48124
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions prior to 3.0.0, the Cursor Desktop could execute workspace-defined Claude hook commands from .claude/settings.local.json without dedicated user approval. A malicious workspace or agent-created file could configure hooks that run local commands in the user's context when an agent turn ends. This could allow sandbox escape, persistence across turns, local data access, or follow-on compromise. This issue has been fixed in version 3.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn versions prior to 3.0.0, Cursor Desktop would execute Claude hook commands defined in .claude/settings.local.json without requiring dedicated user approval. A malicious or compromised workspace could configure hooks that execute arbitrary local commands in the user's context when an agent turn ends, enabling sandbox escape, persistence, or local data access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Cursor versionOpen Cursor Desktop, go to Help > About, or check the application package metadata to find the installed version numberAffected if Version is earlier than 3.0.0 (e.g., 2.x.x, 1.x.x)
-
Locate Claude settings fileNavigate to the user home directory and look for .claude/settings.local.json, or find it in the workspace root .claude/ directoryAffected if This file exists in the user's home directory or project directory
-
Inspect for hook configurationsOpen .claude/settings.local.json and examine the JSON for a 'hooks' key or similar configuration section that defines command executionsAffected if The file contains hook definitions (e.g., 'hooks', 'onTurnEnd', or similar keys with command arrays)
-
Identify executable hook commandsWithin any found hook configuration, review the command values to determine if they execute local system commands, scripts, or binariesAffected if Hooks contain commands that execute local binaries, scripts, or shell commands (not just API calls)
User is affected if running Cursor version before 3.0.0 and a .claude/settings.local.json file exists with configured hook commands that execute locally.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cursor Desktop to version 3.0.0 or later to obtain the fix. Additionally, review any .claude/settings.local.json files in workspaces for suspicious or unexpected hook configurations before opening them.
3.0.0
- Upgrade Cursor Desktop to version 3.0.0 or later
- Verify the upgrade by checking the Cursor version in the application about section
- After upgrading, review .claude/settings.local.json files in workspaces for any suspicious hook configurations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48124 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48124 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data