CVE-2026-48262
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceDOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager where malicious JavaScript can be executed via manipulation of the DOM environment. The vulnerability requires user interaction (victim visiting a crafted webpage) and has a changed scope, indicating the attack can access resources outside the victim's origin.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.5.25.0<= 2020.5.0= 6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Experience Manager versionAccess the AEM Web Console (typically at /system/console/configMgr) or check the version.properties file in the crx-quickstart folder. Alternatively, access the AEM welcome page which displays the version number.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.25.0 or lower, or 2020.5.0 or lower, or exactly 6.5 (any 6.5.x variant).
-
Identify custom frontend components handling DOM manipulationReview custom OSGi bundles or client-side JavaScript files in /apps for code that uses innerHTML, outerHTML, document.write, or similar DOM-manipulation APIs without proper encoding.Affected if Custom or third-party components that insert unsanitized user input into the DOM are deployed.
-
Audit JavaScript code for DOM sinksSearch the codebase (especially in /apps and /libs) for JavaScript files containing dangerous DOM sinks such as innerHTML, outerHTML, insertAdjacentHTML, eval(), or document.write().Affected if Any JavaScript code path uses these sinks with data that could originate from URL parameters, user input, or external sources without sanitization.
-
Identify endpoints accepting user input that feed into DOM operationsReview AEM component templates and HTL scripts for data-binding expressions that render user-controlled content, particularly in custom components or third-party packages.Affected if Components render user-submitted or URL-derived content directly into HTML without encoding.
You are affected if your AEM version falls within <= 6.5.25.0, <= 2020.5.0, or = 6.5 AND your instance has custom components or code that manipulates the DOM with unsanitized user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement proper output encoding and sanitization for all data inserted into the DOM; utilize safe DOM APIs that automatically escape content, and implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution.
AEM 6.5.26.0 or later; AEM as a Cloud Service 2020.6.0 or later
- 1. Identify the current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the AEM welcome page or system console.
- 2. For AEM 6.5.x installations: Upgrade to AEM 6.5.26.0 or later to resolve the DOM-based XSS vulnerability.
- 3. For AEM as a Cloud Service (2020.x): Upgrade to version 2020.6.0 or later.
- 4. After upgrading, clear the AEM cache and publish the changes to all relevant instances.
- 5. Verify the fix by testing that the XSS vulnerability is no longer exploitable in the DOM environment.
- 6. Ensure all custom code and third-party integrations are tested post-upgrade for compatibility.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48262 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48262 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data