SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2026-4834

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The WP ERP Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to SQL Injection via the 'search_key' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1. This is due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The WP ERP Pro plugin for WordPress versions up to 1.5.1 contains a SQL Injection vulnerability in the 'search_key' parameter. The plugin fails to properly escape user input and does not use prepared statements, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL queries and extract sensitive data from the database.

MitigationUpdate the WP ERP Pro plugin to a version beyond 1.5.1 that patches this vulnerability, or apply code fixes to use proper escaping and prepared statements for the 'search_key' parameter in all SQL queries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify WP ERP Pro plugin version
    Access WordPress admin dashboard, navigate to Plugins section, find WP ERP Pro in the list, and note the installed version number. Alternatively, check the plugin header comment in wp-content/plugins/wp-erp-pro/includes/erp.php or the main plugin file.
    Affected if Installed version is lower than 1.5.2 (all prior versions are affected)
  2. Confirm plugin is active
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify that WP ERP Pro is activated.
    Affected if Plugin is active and version is below 1.5.2 - an inactive plugin is not exploitable
  3. Identify exposure to search_key parameter
    The vulnerability lies in the search functionality that processes the 'search_key' parameter in SQL queries. Determine if any public-facing endpoint or API route accepts this parameter by examining plugin code or monitoring HTTP requests to the site.
    Affected if The search feature is accessible to unauthenticated users and the plugin version is below 1.5.2

You are affected if WP ERP Pro plugin is active and the installed version is below 1.5.2, as the unauthenticated SQL injection via the search_key parameter can be exploited.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the WP ERP Pro plugin to a version beyond 1.5.1 that patches this vulnerability, or apply code fixes to use proper escaping and prepared statements for the 'search_key' parameter in all SQL queries.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

WP ERP Pro version 1.5.2 or later

  1. 1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard and go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  2. 2. Locate the WP ERP Pro plugin
  3. 3. Check the current installed version (visible in the plugin list)
  4. 4. Update the plugin to the latest available version from the WordPress plugin repository or from WP ERP's official website
  5. 5. After updating, verify the new version number reflects 1.5.2 or higher
Caveat Review plugin settings after upgrade as minor configuration adjustments may be needed

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4834 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4834 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data