CVE-2026-48502
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.301 and 3.1.7, MessagePackReader.ReadDateTime() can allocate stack memory based on an attacker-controlled MessagePack extension length. In the slow path for timestamp extension parsing, the computed tokenSize includes the extension body length from the wire and is used in a stackalloc operation before the extension length is validated as one of the valid timestamp sizes. A very small payload can claim a large timestamp extension body and cause a stack allocation large enough to trigger an uncatchable StackOverflowException, terminating the host process. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.301 and 3.1.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn MessagePackReader.ReadDateTime(), the extension body length from the wire is used directly in a stackalloc operation before validation of valid timestamp sizes. An attacker can craft a small MessagePack payload claiming a large timestamp extension body, causing stack allocation large enough to trigger an uncatchable StackOverflowException that terminates the host process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.5.301>= 3.0.3, < 3.1.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if MessagePack for C# is usedSearch project files (.csproj, packages.config) for MessagePack package reference, or scan deployed binaries for 'msgpack.dll' or 'MessagePack' namespaceAffected if MessagePack library is present in the environment
-
Determine installed MessagePack versionCheck the package version in .csproj, packages.config, or inspect the loaded MessagePack assembly's FileVersion attributeAffected if Version is less than 2.5.301, or between 3.0.3 and 3.1.6 inclusive
-
Verify if timestamp deserialization occursReview code that calls MessagePackSerializer.Deserialize or uses MessagePackReader.ReadDateTime with untrusted inputAffected if The application deserializes MessagePack payloads containing timestamp extension values from external or untrusted sources
User is affected if MessagePack for C# version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the application deserializes timestamp data from potentially malicious MessagePack payloads.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.5.3013.1.7
Upgrade MessagePack for C# to version 2.5.301 or 3.1.7 or later, which validates the extension length before using it in stack allocation.
MessagePack-CSharp 2.5.301 (for v2.x users) or MessagePack-CSharp 3.1.7 (for v3.x users)
- Identify the current MessagePack-CSharp version in your project (check .csproj, packages.config, or .NET dependency management)
- If using version 2.x (e.g., 2.0-2.5.x), upgrade to version 2.5.301
- If using version 3.x (e.g., 3.0.3-3.1.x), upgrade to version 3.1.7
- Update the package reference in your project file: dotnet add package MessagePack --version <fixed-version> or update the version in packages.config/NuGet reference
- Rebuild the project to verify the new package version is resolved
- Run existing tests, particularly any tests involving MessagePackReader.ReadDateTime() or DateTime deserialization, to confirm the fix works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48502 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48502 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data