Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2026-48529

MEDIUM · 6.0 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
66/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click 8 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
GitHub MCP Server is GitHub's official MCP Server. From 0.22.0 until 1.1.2, when running in HTTP mode with --lockdown-mode enabled, the RepoAccessCache is implemented as a process-global singleton initialized with the first authenticated user's GraphQL client. All subsequent requests from different users share this singleton and their lockdown-related GraphQL queries are executed using the first user's credentials. The singleton is never updated to reflect later users' tokens. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.2.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In GitHub MCP Server versions 0.22.0 through 1.1.2, when running in HTTP mode with --lockdown-mode enabled, the RepoAccessCache is implemented as a process-global singleton initialized with the first authenticated user's GraphQL client. All subsequent requests from different users share this singleton, causing their lockdown-related GraphQL queries to execute using the first user's credentials instead of their own.

MitigationUpgrade to GitHub MCP Server version 1.1.2 or later, which fixes the singleton caching issue so each user's credentials are properly used for their requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed version of GitHub MCP Server
    Run `github-mcp-server --version` or check via package manager (npm list -g @modelcontextprotocol/server-github)
    Affected if Version is between 0.22.0 and 1.1.2 inclusive
  2. Verify HTTP mode is enabled
    Check the process command line arguments or configuration file for the presence of HTTP server flags (such as --http, --port, or similar HTTP mode indicators)
    Affected if Server is running with HTTP mode enabled (not stdio mode)
  3. Verify lockdown-mode is enabled
    Check the process command line arguments or configuration file for `--lockdown-mode` flag or equivalent setting
    Affected if Lockdown mode is enabled via --lockdown-mode flag or config setting
  4. Check for multiple authenticated users
    Review server logs or authentication records to confirm multiple different users have authenticated to the server
    Affected if Multiple authenticated users have accessed the server; the first user's credentials would be reused for subsequent users

You are affected if running GitHub MCP Server version 0.22.0 through 1.1.2 in HTTP mode with lockdown-mode enabled, and multiple users have authenticated (the second user onward would inherit the first user's permissions).

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to GitHub MCP Server version 1.1.2 or later, which fixes the singleton caching issue so each user's credentials are properly used for their requests.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.1.2

  1. Identify all instances of GitHub MCP Server running versions 0.22.0 through 1.1.1 in your environment
  2. Stop the affected GitHub MCP Server instances
  3. Upgrade GitHub MCP Server to version 1.1.2 or later
  4. Restart the service
  5. Verify that --lockdown-mode is functioning correctly with the upgrade by testing that different users' GraphQL queries use their own credentials

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48529 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48529 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data