CVE-2026-48681
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOpenStack Ironic through before 35.0.2 allows file overwrite via directory traversal during deployment with a crafted ISO image.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOpenStack Ironic bare metal provisioning service through version 35.0.1 is vulnerable to directory traversal during ISO image deployment, allowing an attacker to overwrite arbitrary files on the host system by crafting a malicious ISO image with path traversal sequences in file paths.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.0.0, < 26.1.7>= 27.0.0, < 29.0.6>= 30.0.0, < 32.0.2>= 33.0.0, < 35.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Ironic is installedCheck for the ironic-conductor service or python-ironic package: systemctl status ironic-conductor OR rpm -qa | grep ironic OR pip list | grep ironicAffected if Ironic is present on the system
-
Determine installed Ironic versionRun ironic --version or check the package version: pip show ironic or rpm -q openstack-ironic-conductorAffected if Version falls within any of these ranges: >= 17.0.0 and < 26.1.7, OR >= 27.0.0 and < 29.0.6, OR >= 30.0.0 and < 32.0.2, OR >= 33.0.0 and < 35.0.2
-
Confirm ISO image deployment is enabledInspect the Ironic conductor configuration file (typically /etc/ironic/ironic.conf) for the deploy iso-related settings or check if any nodes are configured with iso deploymentAffected if ISO-based deployment is enabled and nodes use ISO images for provisioning
-
Check for recent deployment activity using ISO imagesReview Ironic conductor logs for ISO mount operations or examine deployed node configurations for iso_volume_backend or similar ISO-related parametersAffected if ISO image deployment has been performed recently, indicating the vulnerable code path may have been exercised
The environment is affected if OpenStack Ironic is installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND ISO-based deployment is in use, since the directory traversal only triggers when processing crafted ISO images during deployment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped26.1.729.0.632.0.2
Upgrade OpenStack Ironic to version 35.0.2 or later. Additionally, implement strict validation of ISO image contents and restrict deployment permissions to trusted users.
Upgrade to Ironic 35.0.2 or later (or the latest stable release in your current branch: 26.1.7+, 29.0.6+, 32.0.2+, or 35.0.2+)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Ironic version by checking the package version or OpenStack deployment metadata
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade target version based on current branch: if on 17.x-25.x upgrade to 26.1.7+, if on 27.x-28.x upgrade to 29.0.6+, if on 30.x-31.x upgrade to 32.0.2+, if on 33.x-34.x upgrade to 35.0.2+
- 3. Review OpenStack Ironic release notes for the target version to understand changes and prerequisites
- 4. Create a backup of the Ironic configuration files and database
- 5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before applying to production
- 6. Upgrade the Ironic package using the package manager (e.g., pip install --upgrade ironic or distribution-specific package manager)
- 7. Run database migrations if required (ironic-dbsync upgrade)
- 8. Verify the Ironic services restart correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48681 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data