FastnetmonApplication · Pavel Odintsov

CVE-2026-48684

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.2.9 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
FastNetMon Community Edition through 1.2.9 contains an out-of-bounds read in the NetFlow v9 options template parser. In process_netflow_v9_options_template() (src/netflow_plugin/netflow_v9_collector.cpp), the scope parsing loop (lines 224-229) iterates until scopes_offset reaches the attacker-controlled option_scope_length value, reading netflow9_template_flowset_record_t structures at each step. No bounds check validates that (zone_address + scopes_offset + sizeof(record)) stays within the flowset. The same issue affects the options field loop (lines 241-257) with option_length. Furthermore, option_scope_length is not validated to be a multiple of sizeof(netflow9_template_flowset_record_t), potentially causing misaligned reads. An attacker can trigger reads past the end of the UDP packet buffer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

FastNetMon Community Edition before 1.2.9 has an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the NetFlow v9 options template parser. The process_netflow_v9_options_template() function iterates through scope and option fields using attacker-controlled length values without validating that the calculated offsets stay within the flowset buffer, allowing reads past the end of the UDP packet.

MitigationImplement bounds checking to validate that (zone_address + scopes_offset + sizeof(record)) remains within the flowset buffer, add similar validation for the options field loop, and ensure option_scope_length is a multiple of sizeof(netflow9_template_flowset_record_t) before processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FastnetmonApplication
Affected:<= 1.2.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if FastNetMon is installed
    Check for FastNetMon binary: run 'which fastnetmon' or look for /usr/bin/fastnetmon, /opt/fastnetmon/ directory, or check if process 'fastnetmon' is running
    Affected if FastNetMon binary or process is found on the system
  2. Determine installed FastNetMon version
    Run 'fastnetmon --version' or check version file if present in installation directory
    Affected if Version is 1.2.9 or lower (any version through 1.2.9 is affected)
  3. Verify NetFlow v9 collection is enabled
    Check FastNetMon configuration file (typically /etc/fastnetmon.conf or /opt/fastnetmon/fastnetmon.conf) for 'netflow' or 'flow_collector' settings, and look for 'process_netflow_v9' or similar options
    Affected if NetFlow v9 processing is enabled in the configuration
  4. Confirm UDP listener is active for NetFlow
    Check listening UDP ports: run 'netstat -ulnp | grep 2055' or 'ss -ulnp | grep 2055' (default NetFlow port), also check config for custom port
    Affected if UDP port for NetFlow (default 2055 or configured port) is open and listening

System is affected if FastNetMon Community Edition version 1.2.9 or lower is installed with NetFlow v9 collection enabled and a UDP listener configured to receive NetFlow packets.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.2.9
Interim mitigation

Implement bounds checking to validate that (zone_address + scopes_offset + sizeof(record)) remains within the flowset buffer, add similar validation for the options field loop, and ensure option_scope_length is a multiple of sizeof(netflow9_template_flowset_record_t) before processing.

Fix this in Fastnetmon Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48684 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data