VllmApplication

CVE-2026-48746

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.22.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From 0.3.0 until 0.22.0, a vulnerability in ASGI web servers and starlette's trust on those web servers enables an authentication bypass of the OpenAI API AuthenticationMiddleware. It allows to use the API without providing the configured VLLM_API_KEY or --api-key. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

vLLM versions 0.3.0 through 0.22.0 contain an authentication bypass in the OpenAI API AuthenticationMiddleware. The vulnerability stems from ASGI web servers and starlette improperly trusting certain server configurations, allowing attackers to access the API without providing the configured VLLM_API_KEY or --api-key credential.

MitigationUpgrade vLLM to version 0.22.0 or later to apply the authentication bypass fix. Verify that API key authentication is now enforced by testing API access without credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
VllmApplication
Affected:>= 0.3.0, < 0.22.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed vLLM version
    Run 'pip show vllm' or 'vllm --version' to retrieve the installed version number
    Affected if The version is >= 0.3.0 and < 0.22.0
  2. Verify API server is enabled
    Check if the vLLM API server process is running or if --api-key flag / VLLM_API_KEY environment variable has been configured
    Affected if The API server is running with any authentication configuration present (VLLM_API_KEY set or --api-key specified)
  3. Confirm ASGI server integration is in use
    Identify if the starlette-based API server is being used (default behavior for vLLM serving), typically accessible on port 8000 or configured --port
    Affected if The default ASGI-based API server is active and exposed on a network interface
  4. Test authentication bypass
    Attempt an API request without providing the X-API-Key header to a protected endpoint (e.g., /v1/models) and observe if access is granted
    Affected if Requests succeed without authentication despite VLLM_API_KEY being configured

You are affected if vLLM version is between 0.3.0 and 0.22.0, the API server is running, and unauthenticated requests succeed despite having VLLM_API_KEY configured.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.22.0 or later
Fixed in 0.22.0
Vendor patch github.com →
Interim mitigation

Upgrade vLLM to version 0.22.0 or later to apply the authentication bypass fix. Verify that API key authentication is now enforced by testing API access without credentials.

Recommended fix High confidence

vLLM 0.22.0

  1. Check the current installed version of vLLM using `pip show vllm` or `vllm --version`
  2. Upgrade to vLLM version 0.22.0 or later by running `pip install vllm>=0.22.0`
  3. After upgrading, restart the vLLM service to ensure the patched version is running
  4. Verify the authentication bypass is fixed by attempting to access the API without credentials (should be rejected)
Caveat Review release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and 0.22.0, particularly regarding API compatibility and configuration changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Vllm Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48746 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48746 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data