CVE-2026-48777
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePath traversal vulnerability in FileBrowser Quantum's publicPatchHandler allows users with AllowModify=true share links to move/copy/rename files outside the shared directory. The issue is that filepath.Join collapses '..' segments before the sanitizer runs, bypassing the path validation that was intended to confine operations to the shared directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FileBrowser Quantum installation and versionLocate the FileBrowser Quantum binary or service and run 'filebrowser --version' or check the installed package version to determine if it is below 1.3.3-stable or 1.4.2-betaAffected if The installed version is lower than 1.3.3-stable or 1.4.2-beta
-
Verify sharing feature is enabledExamine the FileBrowser configuration file (usually filebrowser.json or config.yaml) for the 'share' or 'sharing' setting, or check the web UI settings to confirm sharing is turned onAffected if Sharing functionality is enabled in the configuration
-
Confirm AllowModify setting for shared linksLook for share link configurations or user permissions that set AllowModify=true. This may be in config files under a 'shares' or 'links' section, or visible in the admin panel under share link settingsAffected if Any share link or user permission has AllowModify set to true
-
Inspect publicPatchHandler configurationCheck the FileBrowser configuration or source code references to 'publicPatchHandler' to verify this endpoint exists and is accessible for share link operations (move/copy/rename)Affected if The publicPatchHandler endpoint is active and accessible to share link users
If FileBrowser Quantum version is below 1.3.3-stable/1.4.2-beta, sharing is enabled with AllowModify=true on any share link, and the publicPatchHandler is accessible, the path traversal vulnerability is present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to version 1.3.3-stable or 1.4.2-beta. The fix applies sanitization to user-controlled path parameters before filepath.Join, preventing '..' segment collapse from bypassing the boundary check.
1.3.3-stable or 1.4.2-beta
- Identify the current FileBrowser version to confirm it is vulnerable (< 1.3.2-stable, < 1.4.0-beta, or < 1.4.1-beta).
- Upgrade FileBrowser to version 1.3.3-stable (stable branch) or 1.4.2-beta (beta branch).
- Restart the FileBrowser service to apply the changes.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48777 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48777 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data