CVE-2026-4880
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Barcode Scanner (+Mobile App) – Inventory manager, Order fulfillment system, POS (Point of Sale) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via insecure token-based authentication in all versions up to, and including, 1.11.0. This is due to the plugin trusting a user-supplied Base64-encoded user ID in the token parameter to identify users, leaking valid authentication tokens through the 'barcodeScannerConfigs' action, and lacking meta-key restrictions on the 'setUserMeta' action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to escalate their privileges to that of an administrator by first spoofing the admin user ID to leak their authentication token, then using that token to update any user's 'wp_capabilities' meta to gain full administrative access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WordPress plugin uses Base64-encoded user-supplied user IDs to identify users in token-based authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to leak admin authentication tokens via the barcodeScannerConfigs action and then escalate privileges by modifying wp_capabilities meta through the unrestricted setUserMeta action.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the vulnerable pluginList all WordPress plugins and compare their names against known vulnerable plugin names for CVE-2026-4880; check plugin directory for the plugin associated with barcode scanner functionalityAffected if The plugin associated with CVE-2026-4880 is installed and active
-
Check plugin versionAccess the plugin file header (typically in main plugin PHP file) or view plugin details in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, then compare the version to the fixed version 1.11.1Affected if Plugin version is lower than 1.11.1 or the version cannot be determined
-
Verify AJAX action exposureInspect the plugin PHP code for registered AJAX actions named barcodeScannerConfigs and setUserMeta using wp_ajax_ hooks (e.g., add_action('wp_ajax_barcodeScannerConfigs', ...)); attempt a direct HTTP request to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=barcodeScannerConfigs to confirm the endpoint respondsAffected if Both barcodeScannerConfigs and setUserMeta AJAX actions are registered and accessible without authentication
-
Check token-based authentication configurationSearch plugin code for Base64 encoding usage in authentication logic (e.g., base64_decode() applied to user-supplied input); inspect if token-based auth is actively enabled in plugin settingsAffected if Base64-encoded user IDs are used in token-based authentication and the feature is enabled
-
Confirm WordPress meta capability accessReview the setUserMeta action implementation to verify it allows direct modification of wp_capabilities user meta without capability checks; check if any user can trigger this actionAffected if The setUserMeta action permits modification of wp_capabilities meta without proper authorization checks
A user is affected if the vulnerable WordPress plugin (with barcode scanner functionality) is installed with version lower than 1.11.1 and the barcodeScannerConfigs/setUserMeta AJAX actions are exposed without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the plugin to version 1.11.1 or later when available; until then, disable the plugin or restrict access to vulnerable AJAX actions at the server level.
Version 1.11.1 or later (check WordPress plugin repository for latest release)
- 1. Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard and go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- 2. Locate the 'Barcode Scanner (+Mobile App) – Inventory manager, Order fulfillment system, POS (Point of Sale)' plugin
- 3. Check the current installed version - if it is 1.11.0 or below, an update is needed
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
- 5. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly by testing the barcode scanning functionality
- 6. Confirm that unauthorized users can no longer access admin functions through the vulnerable token mechanism
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4880 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data