CVE-2026-48866
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Rocketgenius Inc. Gravity Forms allows Path Traversal. This issue affects Gravity Forms: from n/a through 2.10.0.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in Gravity Forms WordPress plugin allows attackers to access files outside restricted directories through manipulation of file path sequences (e.g., '../'). The critical CVSS 9.6 indicates severe impact, likely enabling unauthorized file read access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Gravity Forms plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins, or check the plugin files in /wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/ for the version fileAffected if Gravity Forms plugin is not present - not affected
-
Determine installed Gravity Forms versionCheck the main plugin file header or version.php in /wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/ for the 'Version' attributeAffected if Version is 2.10.0.1 or lower - potentially affected by the path traversal flaw
-
Confirm file upload functionality is in useCheck Gravity Forms form settings for fields that enable file uploads (File Upload field type) or review active forms that accept file submissionsAffected if File upload fields are configured - the path traversal could be exploited through these inputs
-
Inspect web server logs for traversal attemptsSearch access logs for requests containing '../' or '..%2F' patterns targeting Gravity Forms upload endpoints, typically in /wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/Affected if Suspicious traversal patterns found in logs targeting Gravity Forms - potential exploitation detected
If Gravity Forms version is 2.10.0.1 or lower and file upload functionality is enabled, the environment is vulnerable to path traversal exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest patched version of Gravity Forms. If no patch available, implement WAF rules to block path traversal patterns and restrict file system access permissions on the web server.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-48866 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-48866 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data