CVE-2026-49143
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBrowserStack Runner through 0.9.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the /_log HTTP handler that allows unauthenticated network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code by submitting crafted JSON request bodies to the handler, which passes user-supplied data to vm.runInNewContext() combined with eval(). Attackers can escape the Node.js vm sandbox by leveraging a host-context Function reference through util.format to access the host process via this.constructor.constructor, achieving full remote code execution on the underlying system without any authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBrowserStack Runner versions through 0.9.5 contain an unauthenticated RCE vulnerability in the /_log HTTP handler. The endpoint passes user-supplied JSON data to vm.runInNewContext() combined with eval(), allowing attackers to escape the Node.js sandbox by accessing host-context Function references through this.constructor.constructor via util.format, achieving full remote code execution on the underlying system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BrowserStack Runner versionLocate the BrowserStack Runner installation and check its version (typically via package.json, a --version flag, or the runner's startup output). Compare against the affected range: versions through 0.9.5 are vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is 0.9.5 or earlier.
-
Verify /_log endpoint existsMake an HTTP request to the /_log path on the host where BrowserStack Runner is running (e.g., curl http://localhost:PORT/_log or the actual host/port in use).Affected if The endpoint responds, indicating it is exposed.
-
Test unauthenticated access to /_logSubmit a basic request to /_log without providing any authentication headers or credentials. Observe whether the request is accepted or rejected.Affected if The endpoint accepts requests without requiring authentication.
-
Confirm dangerous vm.runInNewContext patternIf source code is accessible, search for usage of vm.runInNewContext combined with eval() in the logging implementation, particularly in handlers for /_log.Affected if The vulnerable vm.runInNewContext/eval pattern is present in the code handling /_log requests.
You are affected if BrowserStack Runner version 0.9.5 or earlier is installed AND the /_log endpoint is network-accessible without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to the /_log endpoint (ideally disable or add strong authentication), apply any available vendor patch, and consider replacing vm.runInNewContext()/eval() with safe execution alternatives.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49143 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49143 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data