CVE-2026-49213
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. Prior to 3.17.2, Typebot's shared SSRF validator in packages/lib/src/ssrf/validateHttpReqUrl.ts can be bypassed with the IPv6 unspecified address :: because validateIPAddress blocks local, metadata, and private ranges but does not block :: or its expanded form. A workspace editor or creator can configure a server-side HTTP Request block or guarded script fetch to make the Typebot server connect to local HTTP services through safeKy, including flows triggered by POST /v1/typebots/{publicId}/startChat or POST /v1/sessions/{sessionId}/continueChat. This issue is fixed in version 3.17.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTypeBot's SSRF validator fails to block the IPv6 unspecified address (::) when validating HTTP request URLs. The validateIPAddress function blocks local, metadata, and private IP ranges but omits :: or its expanded form, allowing workspace editors or creators to make the server connect to local HTTP services through the server-side HTTP Request block.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify TypeBot versionCheck your TypeBot installation's package.json or running application version. Common locations: check package.json in the deployment directory, or query the application's /api/health or version endpoint if available.Affected if Version is earlier than 3.17.2 (the fix version that blocks IPv6 unspecified address ::)
-
Locate the SSRF validator fileNavigate to packages/lib/src/ssrf/validateHttpReqUrl.ts in your TypeBot source code deployment. Inspect the validateHttpReqUrl function for IPv6 address handling logic.Affected if The file exists and the validation logic does not include a check for the IPv6 unspecified address (::) or its expanded form (0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000)
-
Check validateIPAddress function scopeIn the same codebase, locate the validateIPAddress function (likely in packages/lib/src/ssrf/). Review whether it only handles IPv4 ranges (local, metadata, private) or also covers IPv6 loopback/unspecified addresses.Affected if The function blocks IPv4 private/local ranges but does not block IPv6 unspecified address :: or IPv6 loopback ::1
-
Determine if HTTP Request block is in useReview your TypeBot flows for any configured HTTP Request blocks or guarded script fetch actions. Check flow configuration files or database records of flow definitions.Affected if HTTP Request block or guarded script fetch is enabled and accessible to authenticated workspace editors or creators
-
Verify internal service exposureAssess whether internal HTTP services (localhost, 127.0.0.1, metadata endpoints, internal networks) are accessible from the TypeBot server. Test if the HTTP Request block can reach these endpoints.Affected if Internal services are reachable via HTTP Request block from the TypeBot environment
Your environment is affected if running TypeBot versions prior to 3.17.2 AND the HTTP Request block or guarded script fetch feature is accessible to authenticated users, allowing potential connection to internal services via the unblocked IPv6 :: address.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to TypeBot version 3.17.2 or later which includes the fix to block the IPv6 unspecified address in the SSRF validator.
3.17.2
- Identify the current TypeBot installation version using your package manager or deployment method
- If using npm/npx, check the installed version: npm list @typebot.io/lib or check your package.json
- If using Docker, check the image tag: docker images | grep typebot
- Upgrade to version 3.17.2 or later by updating your dependency or Docker image tag
- For npm installations: npm install @typebot.io/lib@latest or update version in package.json to ^3.17.2
- For Docker: Pull the new image with tag 3.17.2 or latest (e.g., docker pull baptistearno/typebot:3.17.2)
- Restart the TypeBot service to apply the update
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the running version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49213 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data