Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-49220

MEDIUM · 5.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jellyfin is an open source self hosted media server. Prior to 10.11.9, a potential XSS attack exists in Jellyfin which can allow a non-privileged user to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of a logged-in Administrative user, resulting in numerous potential issues. The Client header during an AuthenticateByName can contain arbitrary HTML and Javascript, which will then be executed by the Administrative user when visiting the Access tab of the user in question from within the dashboard. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.11.9.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stored XSS vulnerability exists in Jellyfin where a non-privileged user can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript via the Client header during the AuthenticateByName process. This malicious payload executes when an Administrative user views the Access tab of the compromised user from the Jellyfin dashboard, allowing the attacker to run code in the admin's session context.

MitigationUpgrade Jellyfin to version 10.11.9 or later. As a temporary measure, administrative users should avoid accessing user Access tabs from untrusted sources until the patch is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify your Jellyfin server version
    Log into the Jellyfin dashboard as an administrator, then navigate to Dashboard > General. The server version is displayed at the top of the page. Alternatively, query the /System/Info API endpoint.
    Affected if The installed version is earlier than 10.11.9 (the fixed release).
  2. Verify the Authentication endpoint is accessible
    Confirm the Jellyfin web interface or API is reachable at your server URL. The vulnerable endpoint is /Users/AuthenticateByName which accepts custom Client header values.
    Affected if Jellyfin is exposed and allows authentication requests with custom HTTP headers.
  3. Review user account Client values
    As an administrator, navigate to Dashboard > Users. For each user, click the user name to open their profile, then access the Access tab. Inspect the Client field to see if any unexpected or suspicious values are present that were not intentionally set.
    Affected if Any non-administrative user account displays an unexpected or encoded value in the Client field on their Access tab, indicating potential injection.
  4. Check server logs for suspicious authentication attempts
    Examine Jellyfin logs (Dashboard > Logging) for entries containing the /Users/AuthenticateByName endpoint with unusual Client header patterns, such as HTML tags, script elements, or encoded characters.
    Affected if Logs show authentication attempts with Client headers containing <script>, javascript:, or similar XSS payloads.

You are affected if your Jellyfin version is earlier than 10.11.9 AND any user account displays an unexpected value in their Client Access field, indicating the XSS payload was stored and could execute in an administrator's session.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Jellyfin to version 10.11.9 or later. As a temporary measure, administrative users should avoid accessing user Access tabs from untrusted sources until the patch is applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

10.11.9

  1. Upgrade Jellyfin to version 10.11.9 or later to remediate this XSS vulnerability

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-49220 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-49220 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data