CVE-2026-4924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper authentication in the two-factor authentication (2FA) feature in Devolutions Server 2026.1.11 and earlier allows a remote attacker with valid credentials to bypass multifactor authentication and gain unauthorized access to the victim account via reuse of a partially authenticated session token.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceDevolutions Server 2026.1.11 and earlier contains an improper authentication vulnerability in the 2FA feature. A remote attacker with valid credentials can bypass multifactor authentication by reusing a partially authenticated session token, allowing unauthorized access to the victim account without completing the second factor verification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.3.18.0>= 2026.1.1.0, < 2026.1.12.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Devolutions Server is installedCheck for Devolutions Server installation in your environment using system inventory tools, Windows Programs and Features, or by locating the installation directoryAffected if Devolutions Server is present on the system
-
Determine the installed Devolutions Server versionLaunch Devolutions Server Manager and navigate to Help > About, or check the version listed in Windows Programs and FeaturesAffected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: < 2025.3.18.0 OR >= 2026.1.1.0 AND < 2026.1.12.0
-
Verify if 2FA is enabledIn the Devolutions Server administration console, go to User Management or Security Settings and check whether Two-Factor Authentication is configured and active for any accountsAffected if 2FA is enabled, making the authentication bypass vulnerability applicable to affected versions
-
Inspect session token behavior during 2FA flowReview authentication logs or perform a test login while capturing network traffic to observe whether session tokens from a partially authenticated state (after first factor) remain valid and reusableAffected if Session tokens from incomplete 2FA attempts can be reused to gain full account access without completing the second factor
You are affected if Devolutions Server is installed with a version in the vulnerable range and 2FA is enabled, allowing a remote attacker with valid credentials to bypass the second authentication factor by reusing a partially authenticated session token.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.3.18.02026.1.12.0
Upgrade to Devolutions Server version 2026.1.12 or later to remediate this vulnerability. After upgrading, verify that the 2FA authentication flow properly invalidates session tokens after each authentication step.
Upgrade to Devolutions Server 2026.1.12.0 or later (or 2025.3.18.0+ for older branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Devolutions Server version by checking the application or installation directory.
- 2. If running version 2026.1.1.0 through 2026.1.11.0, upgrade to version 2026.1.12.0 or later.
- 3. If running version older than 2025.3.18.0, upgrade to version 2025.3.18.0 or later.
- 4. After upgrading, verify that the 2FA authentication flow works correctly and that session tokens are properly invalidated after partial authentication.
- 5. Review audit logs to confirm no unauthorized access occurred during the vulnerability window.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data